The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IT Value: The Great Divide Between Qualitative and Quantitative and Individual and Organizational Measures
Abstract
:A comprehensive review was conducted of IT value articles in the Communications of the ACM, Information Systems Research, Journal of Management Information Systems, and MIS Quarterly from 1993 to 1998. IT-value measures published during this period were documented, classified, analyzed, and reported. The review of these journal articles revealed a schism between the use of organization-level measures and other measures. Communications of the ACM and Information Systems Research also provided strong evidence of a schism between the use of quantitative and qualitative measures in IT-value research. The Journal of Management information Systems and MIS Quarterly data provided more limited evidence of this schism as well. These schisms have become more pronounced over time. This may be due partly to an increasing reliance on secondary data set analyses that use only quantitative measures and organization-level analyses. The current research confirmed what many researchers suspect—schisms exist, and may be deepening, in IT-value research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249689 · Cited by 6,006
The productivity paradox of information technology
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/163298.163309 · Cited by 2,604
The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet
Bakos, Y. (1998) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/280324.280330 · Cited by 1,386
Early expert systems: Where are they now?
Gill, T. G. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249711 · Cited by 181
Cited by
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,987
Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance1
Santhanam, R., & Hartono, E. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036521 · Cited by 1,026
Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.275.82 · Cited by 779
Chae, H.-C., Koh, C. E., & Prybutok, V. R. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.1.14 · Cited by 461
Schryen, G. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.45 · Cited by 420
E‐commerce usage and business performance in the Malaysian tourism sector: empirical analysis
Intan Salwani, M., Marthandan, G., Daud Norzaidi, M., & Choy Chong, S. (2009) · Information Management & Computer Security · doi:10.1108/09685220910964027 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, Y. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 225-261
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W1510259567
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
