Cited by 151Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityInformation Technology Governance and StrategyInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Decision Problems in Blockchain Governance: Old Wine in New Bottles or Walking in Someone Else’s Shoes?

Open access
Ziolkowski, Rafael, Miscione, Gianluca, Schwabe, Gerhard·2020·Journal of Management Information Systems

Abstract

Blockchain comes with the promise of being a disruptive technology with the potential for novel ways of interaction in a wide range of applications. Following broader application, scholarly interest in the technology is growing, though an extensive analysis of blockchain applications from a governance perspective is lacking to date. This research pays special attention to the governance of blockchain systems and illustrates decision problems in 14 blockchain systems from four application domains. Based on academic literature, semi-structured interviews with representatives from those organizations, and content analysis of grey literature, common problems in blockchain governance have been singled out and contextualized. Studying their enactment revealed their relevance to major organizational theories in what we labelled “Patrolling the borders,” “External Legitimation,” “Reduction of Discretionality,” and “Temporal Management.” The identification of these problems enriches the scarce body of knowledge on the governance of blockchain systems, resulting in a better understanding of how blockchain governance links to existing concepts and how it is enacted in practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07421222.2020.1759974

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Governance entails managing competing stakeholder interests and implementing effective decision-making processes, value creation strategies, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

    “Governance entails managing competing stakeholder interests and implementing effective decision-making processes, value creation strategies, and dispute resolution mechanisms (Zavolokina et al., 2020; Ziolkowski et al., 2020).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 118 · Cited by 151

Authors
Ziolkowski, R., Miscione, G., & Schwabe, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Ziolkowski, Rafael
Venue
Journal of Management Information Systems
Published
2020-04-02
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
316-348
ISSN
  • 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-928X
OpenAlex
W3034219685
Cited by
151
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 2
FWCI
19.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
blockchain governance, decision problems, organizational theory, organizational legitimacy, temporal management, organizational boundaries, blockchain applications, organizational change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review