Cited by 317Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth and Lifestyle StudiesHigher Education Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Binge Drinking, Tobacco, and Illicit Drug Use and Involvement in College Athletics: A Survey of Students at 140 American Colleges

Abstract

Binge drinking (heavy, episodic alcohol consumption), tobacco, and illicit drug use among a random sample of 140 American colleges were examined by means of a mail survey. Students were divided into three groups on the basis of their involvement in athletics: whether they were involved, partly involved, or not involved. In addition, individual correlates of binge drinking among athletically involved students were studied. The survey results indicated that students involved in college athletics engaged in binge drinking and tobacco more often than students not involved in athletics, but were less likely to be cigarette smokers or marijuana users. The strongest predictors of binge drinking among students involved in athletics were residence in a fraternity or a sorority, a party lifestyle, engagement in other risky behaviors, and previous binging in high school. Coaches may play an important role in discouraging substance use and need to be a part of campus prevention efforts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07448481.1997.9936884

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1001/jama.1994.03520210056032 · DOI
  2. Liljestrand P., 1993, J Alcohol Drug Educ, 38, 1
  3. Saltz R., 1986, Contemp Drug Probl, 13, 117
  4. Hughes S., 1983, J Coll Student Personnel, 20, 257
  5. Nattiv A., 1991, J Fam Pract, 33, 585
  6. Toohey J. V., 1981, Bull Narc, 33, 23
  7. Toohey J. V., 1978, Bull Narc, 30, 61

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 317

Metadata

Authors
Wechsler, H., Davenport, A. E., Dowdall, G. W., Grossman, S. J., & Zanakos, S. I.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Saint Joseph's University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
Journal of American College Health
Published
1997-03-01
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
195-200
ISSN
  • 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
  • 0744-8481
  • 1940-3208
OpenAlex
W2013846853
Cited by
317
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Lifestyle Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
binge drinking, college athletes, tobacco use, illicit drug use, cannabis use, cigarette smoking, risk-taking, coaches, substance use prevention, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Female, Humans, Male, Plants, Toxic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk-Taking, Smoking, Sports, Students, Tobacco, Smokeless, United States, Universities, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review