The long-term effectiveness of a social norming campaign to reduce high-risk drinking: The Michigan State University experience, 2000–2014
Abstract
Objective Evaluate effectiveness of a university-wide social norms marketing campaign to reduce high-risk drinking and its consequences among students at MSU. Participants: Campaign messages regarding descriptive and injunctive norms were distributed campus-wide from 2001 to 2014 to correct norm misperceptions. Methods: Random samples of students surveyed most semesters to monitor message saturation, dosage, and believability along with drinking attitudes, behaviors and harm related to celebratory events. NCHA conducted biennially since 2000 to assess overall progress. Results: Perceived drinking norms declined along with measures of actual drinking intensity, frequency, and frequency of intense drinking. Use of protective behaviors most often addressed in campaign messages increased while driving after drinking declined. Importantly, reported adverse effects of drinking on academic performance declined substantially. Conclusions: The evidence suggests the social norms approach has been effective at reducing adverse academic outcomes of drinking. Changes in perceptions, attitudes, behaviors and outcomes appear to be continuing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Campus-based social norms campaigns have been shown to reduce alcohol and other drug use among college students, particularly those who overestimate the use of their peers.
“Campus-based social norms campaigns have been shown to reduce alcohol and other drug use among college students, particularly those who overestimate the use of their peers (Hembroff et al., 2021, Mattern and Neighbors, 2004, Pischke et al., 2021).”
From The substance use disorder treatment gap among US college students: Findings from the 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2024) · cites this paper as Hembroff et al., 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Hembroff, L. A., Martell, D., Allen, R., Poole, A., Clark, K., & Smith, S. W.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- GardenShare (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hembroff, Larry A.
- ORCID
- Smith, Sandi W.
- Venue
- Journal of American College Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-10-29
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 315-325
- ISSN
- 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
- 0744-8481
- 1940-3208
- OpenAlex
- W2982304230
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Education (# S184H010081, # Q184NO70002))
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- social norms marketing, hazardous drinking, university students, alcohol consumption, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, protective behavior, drunk driving, campaign effectiveness, Michigan State University
- MeSH terms
- Alcohol Drinking, Humans, Michigan, Students, Universities, Social Norms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review