Group-based acceptance and commitment therapy to enhance graduate student psychological flexibility: Treatment development and preliminary implementation evaluation
Abstract
Objective Graduate student mental health is a growing concern and the need for interventions is well-documented. This manuscript outlines an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy group treatment for graduate students intended to promote psychological flexibility through the cultivation of six processes: contact with the present moment (mindfulness), freely chosen life direction (values), distance from thoughts (defusion), nonjudgmental acknowledgement of one’s internal experiences (acceptance), meta-awareness of one’s own experiences (self-as-context), and ongoing patterns of behavior in the service of values (committed action). Participants: The treatment was delivered to graduate students across academic disciplines with variable psychological concerns over several semesters. Method: Graduate students completed measures of preliminary acceptability. Results: Clients perceived the intervention positively and believed they benefited from participating. Conclusion: Treatment evaluation information support the social validity and acceptability of the treatment and justify future studies assessing treatment efficacy and effectiveness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One article each fell into the categories of within-person research design, single-subject design, and other.
“Finally, one article fell into each of the following categories: within-person research design (Grégoire et al., 2020), singlesubject design (Juncos and Markman, 2016), and other (Lewin et al., 2021).”
From A Scoping Review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Lewin et al., 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Lewin, R. K., Acuff, S. F., Berlin, K. S., Berman, J. S., & Murrell, A. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Memphis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lewin, Rivian K.
- Venue
- Journal of American College Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-02-12
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 162-171
- ISSN
- 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
- 0744-8481
- 1940-3208
- OpenAlex
- W3128946302
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- acceptance and commitment therapy, group therapy, graduate students, psychological flexibility, mindfulness, values, defusion, acceptance, self-as-context, committed action, treatment acceptability, social validity, treatment development, student mental health
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Students, Universities, Treatment Outcome, Mindfulness, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review