The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benefits and limitations of panel data
Abstract
Observations for a number of cross-sectional units over time have become increasingly available. The new data sources enable econometricians to construct and test more complicated behavioral models than a single cross sectional or time series data set would allow. The availability of new data sources, however, also raises new issues. In this paper we review some basic econo- metric methods that have been used to analyze such data sets. We also indicate areas of research where panel data may be useful.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects
Nickell, S. (1981) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911408 · Cited by 8,735
Hsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Self-citationHsiao, C. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781009057745 · Cited by 7,869
Self-citationOn the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data
Mundlak, Y. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913646 · Cited by 5,412
(1976) · Annals of Economic and Social Measurement · Cited by 5,035
Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship
Hausman, J., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. (1984) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911191 · Cited by 3,393
Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data
Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1982) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(82)90095-1 · Cited by 2,849
Self-citationConsistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations
Neyman, J., & Scott, E. L. (1948) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914288 · Cited by 2,691
Cited by
On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models
Kiviet, J. F. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01643-e · Cited by 1,926
Working capital management, corporate performance, and financial constraints
Baños-Caballero, S., García-Teruel, P. J., & Martínez-Solano, P. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.01.016 · Cited by 608
Limitations of Fixed-Effects Models for Panel Data
Hill, T. D., Davis, A. P., Roos, J. M., & French, M. T. (2020) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1177/0731121419863785 · Cited by 336
Working capital management in SMEs
Baños‐Caballero, S., García‐Teruel, P. J., & Martínez‐Solano, P. (2010) · Accounting & Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1467-629x.2009.00331.x · Cited by 317
Capital structure in an emerging stock market: The case of India
Chakraborty, I. (2010) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2010.02.001 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsiao, C.
- Venue
- Econometric Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 121-174
- ISSN
- 0747-4938 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4168
- OpenAlex
- W2082770469
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benefits and limitations of panel data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07474938508800078
- The paper
- Hsiao, C. (1985). Benefits and limitations of panel data. Econometric Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938508800078
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
