The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CONTINUING BONDS IN BEREAVEMENT: AN ATTACHMENT THEORY BASED PERSPECTIVE
Abstract
An attachment theory based perspective on the continuing bond to the deceased (CB) is proposed. The value of attachment theory in specifying the normative course of CB expression and in identifying adaptive versus maladaptive variants of CB expression based on their deviation from this normative course is outlined. The role of individual differences in attachment security on effective versus ineffective use of CB in coping with bereavement also is addressed. Finally, the moderating influence of type of loss (e.g., death of a spouse vs. child), culture, and religion on type of CB expression within an overarching attachment framework is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment
Rever, G. W. (1972) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197211000-00011 · Cited by 8,446
THE DUAL PROCESS MODEL OF COPING WITH BEREAVEMENT: RATIONALE AND DESCRIPTION
Schut, M. S. (1999) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/074811899201046 · Cited by 2,560 · cited 2×
“An inordinate psychological investment in the deceased’s possessions may also leave less personal resources available for taking steps toward constructing a new life, known to be an important task of bereavement (Stroebe & Schut, 1999).”
Background(1990) · doi:10.1097/00004583-199109000-00043 · Cited by 1,085
Searching for the meaning of meaning: Grief therapy and the process of reconstruction
Neimeyer, R. A. (2000) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481180050121480 · Cited by 591 · cited 2×
“Such expressions should endure after the death of a valued relationship and thus constitute a central part of grief resolution in enabling the bereaved to preserve a sense of identity and meaningful connection with the past (Attig, 2001; Fraley & Shaver, 1999; Marwit & Klass, 1995; Neimeyer, 2000).”
BackgroundNEIMEYER, R. A., PRIGERSON, H. G., & DAVIES, B. (2002) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/000276402236676 · Cited by 373
Continuing bonds and adjustment at 5 years after the death of a spouse
Field, N. P., Gal-Oz, E., & Bonanno, G. A. (2003) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.71.1.110 · Cited by 215 · cited 2×
“Recent empirical literature suggests that CB is not invariably adaptive, however (Field, Nichols, Holen, & Horowitz, 1999 ; Field, Gal-Oz, & Bonanno, 2003 ).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Gillies, J., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2006) · Journal of Constructivist Psychology · doi:10.1080/10720530500311182 · Cited by 678
Continuing bonds and reconstructing meaning: mitigating complications in bereavement.
Neimeyer, R. A., Baldwin, S. A., & Gillies, J. (2006) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481180600848322 · Cited by 497
Attachment, loss, and complicated grief
Shear, K., & Shair, H. (2005) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.20091 · Cited by 443
The Oxford Handbook of Health Psychology
(2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195342819.001.0001 · Cited by 340
Complicated grief and the quest for meaning: A constructivist contribution
Neimeyer, R. A. (2006) · OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying · doi:10.2190/eql1-ln3v-knyr-18tf · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- FIELD, N. P., GAO, B., & PADERNA, L.
- Venue
- Death Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 277-299
- ISSN
- 0748-1187 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-7683
- OpenAlex
- W2057819190
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CONTINUING BONDS IN BEREAVEMENT: AN ATTACHMENT THEORY BASED PERSPECTIVE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07481180590923689
- The paper
- FIELD, N. P., GAO, B., & PADERNA, L. (2005). CONTINUING BONDS IN BEREAVEMENT: AN ATTACHMENT THEORY BASED PERSPECTIVE. Death Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180590923689
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
