No Sabo Girls: Transnational Latinidad via Social Media
Abstract
TikTok is a video-only social media platform with an estimated one billion global users. This study focuses on TikTok videos produced by and for Latine girls who employ the meme “no sabo,” a malapropism of “no sé” or “I don’t know.” More than a phrase to describe Latines with awkward Spanish fluency, the term indexes Latines struggling with the fluid and contingent standards of Latinidad. Latine girls occupy specific intersections of positionalities that offer both limitations and possibilities concerning Latinidad’s dominant constructs. Through inductive critical analysis, this study examines Latine girls’ no sabo TikTok videos as a form of transnational discourse. We identify three transnational mimetic suggestions across three transgressive themes: translating, transmuting, and transgenerating. These themes present agentic capacities of and for Latine girls in the twenty-first century. Our findings underscore the innovative and transformative strategies that can be located in these Latine girls’ videos for reimagining cultural belonging.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Latinx girls' portrayal of 'no sabo' kids on social media evidences their agentic capacities to deconstruct what constitutes Latinidad.
“On the other hand, Moreman and Alvarado (2025) found that the way Latinx girls portray “no sabo” kids on social media evidences their “agentic capacities” to deconstruct what constitutes Latinidad.”
From Sounds Like Politics: Cardi B and the Discourse of Español Ratatá (2026) · cites this paper as Moreman and Alvarado (2025)
'No sabo' kids are reappropriating the term in a positive way, including by using it in usernames.
“In essence, the “no sabo” kids are reappropriating the term in a positive way, so much so that people are including “no sabo” in their usernames (Moreman & Alvarado, 2025).”
From Sounds Like Politics: Cardi B and the Discourse of Español Ratatá (2026) · cites this paper as Moreman & Alvarado, 2025
Cites
The Next Billion Users: Digital Life Beyond the West
Arora, P. (2019) · doi:10.4159/9780674238879 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Zillich, A. F., & Riesmeyer, C. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211033810 · Cited by 41 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For all adolescents, social media platforms have become increasingly significant for adolescent socialization and identity experimentation (Siebers et al., 2024; Zillich & Riesmeyer, 2021); and Latine girls benefit from the permissible creativity of these platforms.”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sounds Like Politics: Cardi B and the Discourse of Español Ratatá
Delgado, R., Mora-Moreno, S., & Cervantes-Gómez, X. V. (2026) · Latino Studies · doi:10.1057/s41276-026-00579-w
- Authors
- Moreman, S. T., & Alvarado, R. F.
- Affiliations
- California State University System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moreman, Shane T.
- Venue
- Women's Studies in Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2025-04-03
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-179
- ISSN
- 0749-1409 (ISSN-L)
- 2152-999X
- OpenAlex
- W4409554538
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Women s Studies in Communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Latin American and Latino Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
- Keywords
- Latinidad, TikTok, transnationalism, social media, malapropisms, Spanish language, cultural belonging, translation, intersectionality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review