Practical guidance on the initiation, titration, and switching of basal insulins: a narrative review for primary care
Open accessAbstract
Many patients with type 2 diabetes will ultimately require the inclusion of basal insulin in their treatment regimen. Since most people with type 2 diabetes are managed in the community, it is important that primary care providers understand and correctly manage the initiation and titration of basal insulins, and help patients to self-manage insulin injections. Newer, long-acting basal insulins provide greater stability and flexibility than older preparations and improved delivery systems. Basal insulin is usually initiated at a conservative dose of 10 units/day or 0.1-0.2 units/kg/day, then titrated thereafter over several weeks or months, based on patients' self-measured fasting plasma glucose, to achieve an individualized target (usually 80-130 mg/dL). Through a shared decision-making process, confirmation of appropriate goals and titration methods should be established, including provisions for events that might alter scheduled titration (e.g. travel, dietary change, illness, hospitalization, etc.). Although switching between basal insulins is usually easily accomplished, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between formulations require clinicians to provide explicit guidance to patients. Basal insulin is effective long-term, but overbasalization (continuing to escalate dose without a meaningful reduction in fasting plasma glucose) should be avoided.Key messagesPrimary care providers often initiate basal insulin for people with type 2 diabetes.Basal insulin is recommended to be initiated at 10 units/day or 0.1-0.2 units/kg/day, and doses must be titrated to agreed fasting plasma glucose goals, usually 80-130 mg/dL. A simple rule is to gradually increase the initial dose by 1 unit per day (NPH, insulin detemir, and glargine 100 units/mL) or 2-4 units once or twice per week (NPH, insulin detemir, glargine 100 and 300 units/mL, and degludec) until FPG levels remain consistently within the target range. If warranted, switching between basal insulins can be done using simple regimens.The dose of basal insulin should be increased as required up to approximately 0.5-1.0 units/kg/day in some cases. Overbasalization (continuing to escalate dose without a meaningful reduction in fasting plasma glucose) is not recommended; rather re-evaluation of individual therapy, including consideration of more concentrated basal insulin preparations and/or short-acting prandial insulin as well as other glucose-lowering therapies, is suggested.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An initial dose reduction of 10-20% is typically needed when switching from insulin detemir or U-300 glargine to another insulin.
“an initial dose reduction of 10-20% can be used for individuals in very tight management or at high risk for hypoglycemia and is typically needed when switching from insulin detemir or U-300 glargine to another insulin (169).”
From 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [169]
The ‘How to switch between basal insulins’ section recommends using 80% of the prior dose when switching from U-300 to U-100 glargine, supporting a 20% reduction for that specific switch. It says switching from detemir to another intermediate- or long-acting insulin is generally unit-for-unit, though adjustment may be needed when switching to U-100 glargine. It does not give a general 10–20% reduction for detemir switches or the cited recommendation for people with very tight management or high hypoglycemia risk; page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
Marso, S. P., Daniels, G. H., Brown-Frandsen, K., Kristensen, P., Mann, J. F. E., Nauck, M. A., Nissen, S. E., Pocock, S., Poulter, N. R., Ravn, L. S., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1603827 · Cited by 7,629 · see citing works
Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Marso, S. P., Bain, S. C., Consoli, A., Eliaschewitz, F. G., Jódar, E., Leiter, L. A., Lingvay, I., Rosenstock, J., Seufert, J., Warren, M. L., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1607141 · Cited by 6,900 · see citing works
Buse, J. B., Wexler, D. J., Tsapas, A., Rossing, P., Mingrone, G., Mathieu, C., D’Alessio, D. A., & Davies, M. J. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci19-0066 · Cited by 1,192 · see citing works
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: <i>Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021</i>
American Diabetes Association (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc21-s009 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
6. Glycemic Targets: <i>Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020</i>
American Diabetes Association (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-s006 · Cited by 744 · see citing works
Efficacy and safety of degludec versus glargine in type 2 diabetes.
Marso, S. P., McGuire, D. K., Zinman, B., Poulter, N. R., Emerson, S. S., Pieber, T. R., Pratley, R. E., Haahr, P.-M., Lange, M., Brown-Frandsen, K., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1615692 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
New insulin delivery recommendations
Frid, A. H., Kreugel, G., Grassi, G., Halimi, S., Hicks, D., Hirsch, L. J., Smith, M. J., Wellhoener, R., Bode, B. W., Hirsch, I. B., et al. (2016) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.06.010 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Meneghini, L., Atkin, S. L., Gough, S. C. L., Raz, I., Blonde, L., Shestakova, M., Bain, S., Johansen, T., Begtrup, K., Birkeland, K. I., et al. (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-1668 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Therapeutic inertia amongst general practitioners with interest in diabetes
Seidu, S., Than, T., Kar, D., Lamba, A., Brown, P., Zafar, A., Hussain, R., Amjad, A., Capehorn, M., Martin, E., et al. (2018) · Primary Care Diabetes · doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2017.09.001 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- [1]Davidson JA. The increasing role of primary care physicians in caring for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010; 85(12 Suppl): S3– S4. PMC2996164 21106869
- [2]Holman RR, Turner RC. Diabetes: the quest for basal normoglycaemia. Lancet. 1977; 1(8009): 469– 474. 65573
- [3]Cheng AYY, Patel DK, Reid TS, et al. Differentiating basal insulin preparations: understanding how they work explains why they are different. Adv Ther. 2019; 36(5): 1018– 1030. 30929185 PMC6824364
- [7]Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019; 394(10193): 121– 130. 31189511
- [8]Hernandez AF, Green JB, Janmohamed S, et al. Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2018; 392(10157): 1519– 1529. 30291013
- [9]Khunti K, Wolden ML, Thorsted BL, et al. Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(11): 3411– 3417. 23877982 PMC3816889
- [10]Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Guzman S, et al. Psychological insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes: the scope of the problem. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(10): 2543– 2545. 16186296
- [11]Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, et al. Resistance to insulin therapy among patients and providers: results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(11): 2673– 2679. 16249538
- [12]Ratanawongsa N, Crosson JC, Schillinger D, et al. Getting under the skin of clinical inertia in insulin initiation: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Insulin Starts Project. Diabetes Educ. 2012; 38(1): 94– 100. 22222513 PMC3557962
- [13]Sorli C, Heile MK. Identifying and meeting the challenges of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes. J Multidiscip Health. 2014; 7: 267– 282. PMC4086769 25061317
- [14]Zafar A, Stone MA, Davies MJ, et al. Acknowledging and allocating responsibility for clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: a qualitative study. Diabet Med. 2015; 32(3): 407– 413. 25251768
- [16]Hermansen K, Davies M, Derezinski T, et al. A 26-week, randomized, parallel, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin as add-on therapy to oral glucose-lowering drugs in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29(6): 1269– 1274. 16732007
- [17]Owens DR, Traylor L, Mullins P, et al. Patient-level meta-analysis of efficacy and hypoglycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes initiating insulin glargine 100 U/mL or neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin analysed according to concomitant oral antidiabetes therapy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017; 124(Supplement C): 57– 65. 28092788
- [18]Ritzel R, Roussel R, Giaccari A, et al. Better glycaemic control and less hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL vs glargine 100 U/mL: 1-year patient-level meta-analysis of the EDITION clinical studies in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018; 20(3): 541– 548. 28862801 PMC5836995
- [19]Wysham C, Bhargava A, Chaykin L, et al. Effect of insulin degludec vs. insulin glargine u100 on hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: the SWITCH 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017; 318(1): 45– 56. 28672317 PMC5817473
- [20]Berard L, Antonishyn N, Acurdi K, et al. Insulin matters: a practical approach to basal insulin management in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2018; 9(2): 501– 519. 29476414 PMC6104258
- [21]Kuritzky L, Reid TS, Wysham CH. Practical guidance on effective basal insulin titration for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes. 2019; 37(4): 368– 376. 31660010 PMC6794223
- [22]Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018; 41(12): 2669– 2701. 30291106 PMC6245208
- [23]Lipska KJ, Parker MM, Moffet HH, et al. Association of initiation of basal insulin analogs vs. neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin with hypoglycemia-related emergency department visits or hospital admissions and with glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2018; 320(1): 53– 62. 29936529 PMC6134432
- [24]LaSalle JR. Empowering patients during insulin initiation: a real-world approach. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010; 110(2): 69– 78. 20160245
- [31]Riddle MC, Bolli GB, Home PD, et al. Efficacy and safety of flexible versus fixed dosing intervals of insulin glargine 300 U/mL in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016; 18(4): 252– 257. 26840338 PMC4827283
- [32]Diabetes Canada. Building competency in diabetes education: the essentials. 2016. Chapter 8, Saskatchewan advanced insulin dose adjustment module: p. 17–18. [cited 2020 Aug 18]. Available from: https://www.ehealthsask.ca/services/resources/Resources/advanced-insulin-dose-adjustment-module.pdf
- [33]Philis-Tsimikas A. Initiating basal insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: practical steps to optimize glycemic control. Am J Med. 2013; 126(0):S21– S27. 23953076
- [34]Beato-Víbora PI, Arroyo-Díez FJ. New uses and formulations of glucagon for hypoglycaemia. Drugs Context. 2019; 8: 212599. 31402931 PMC6675539
- [36]Trief PM, Cibula D, Rodriguez E, et al. Incorrect insulin administration: a problem that warrants attention. Clin Diabetes. 2016; 34(1): 25– 33. 26807006 PMC4714726
- [37]Castellana M, Procino F, Sardone R, et al. Efficacy and safety of patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020; 8(1): e001477. PMC7342431 32636220
- [38]Patel D, Triplitt C, Trujillo J. Appropriate titration of basal insulin in type 2 diabetes and the potential role of the pharmacist. Adv Ther. 2019; 36(5): 1031– 1051. 30900198 PMC6824379
- [39]Yale JF, Berard L, Groleau M, et al. TITRATION: a randomized study to assess 2 treatment algorithms with new insulin glargine 300 units/ml. Can J Diabetes. 2017; 41(5): 478– 484. 28803820
- [40]Gerstein HC, Yale JF, Harris SB, et al. A randomized trial of adding insulin glargine vs. avoidance of insulin in people with type 2 diabetes on either no oral glucose-lowering agents or submaximal doses of metformin and/or sulphonylureas: the Canadian INSIGHT (Implementing New Strategies with Insulin Glargine for Hyperglycaemia Treatment) Study. Diabet Med. 2006; 23(7): 736– 742. 16842477
- [41]Zhang T, Zhao Y, Du T, et al. Lack of coordination between partners: investigation of Physician-Preferred and Patient-Preferred (4P) basal insulin titration algorithms in the real world. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018; 12: 1253– 1259. 30050287 PMC6055906
- [43]Bajaj S, Das AK, Kalra S, et al. BE-SMART (Basal Early Strategies to Maximize HbA1c Reduction with Oral Therapy). Diabetes Ther. 2019; 10(4): 1189– 1204. 31102253 PMC6612329
- [44]Eng C, Kramer CK, Zinman B, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and basal insulin combination treatment for the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014; 384(9961): 2228– 2234. 25220191
- [45]Maiorino MI, Chiodini P, Bellastella G, et al. Insulin and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist combination therapy in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40(4): 614– 624. 28325801
- [48]Umpierrez GE, Holt EH, Einhorn D, et al. Concentrated insulins: clinical update of therapeutic options. Endocrine Pract. 2020; 26(Suppl. 3): 1– 12. 32339033
- [53]Lingvay I, Pérez Manghi F, García-Hernández P, et al. Effect of insulin glargine up-titration vs. insulin degludec/liraglutide on glycated hemoglobin levels in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes the DUAL V randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016; 315(9): 898– 907. 26934259
- [54]Davies MJ, Russell-Jones D, Barber TM, et al. Glycaemic benefit of iGlarLixi in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes patients with high HbA1c or those with inadequate glycaemic control on two oral antihyperglycaemic drugs in the LixiLan-O randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019; 21(8): 1967– 1972. 31124299 PMC6772132
- [55]Kalra S. Insulin degludec aspart: the first co-formulation of insulin analogues. Diabetes Ther. 2014; 5(1): 65– 72. 24828136 PMC4065296
Cited by
Sorted by citations
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., McCoy, R. G., Aleppo, G., Bajaj, M., Balapattabi, K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., Bruemmer, D., Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. B., et al. (2025) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc25-s009 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mehta, R., Goldenberg, R., Katselnik, D., & Kuritzky, L.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (MX)
- LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology (Canada) (CA)
- Diabetes and Metabolism Specialists
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mehta, Roopa
- Venue
- Annals of Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 999-1010
- ISSN
- 0785-3890 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2060
- PMC
- PMC8231382
- OpenAlex
- W3175783883
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (cc-by)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk Inc.
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, insulin initiation, insulin dose adjustment, insulin switching, shared decision-making, insulin delivery devices, insulin degludec, insulin detemir, glargine, NPH insulin, insulin self-injection, primary care
- MeSH terms
- Insulin Glargine, Insulin Detemir, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Primary Health Care, Insulin, Long-Acting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review