Cited by 18Crustacean biology and ecologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Response of terrestrial isopods,Armadillidium vulgare and Porcellio laevis(Isopoda: Oniscidea) to the ant Tetramorium caespitum: morphology, behavior and reproductive success

CASTILLO, MARY ELLEN, KIGHT, SCOTT L.·2005·Invertebrate Reproduction & Development

Abstract

Summary Little is known about the effects of predatory stress on reproduction in terrestrial isopods (Crustacea: Oniscidea). We studied direct and indirect influences of predatory ants Tetramorium caespitum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on the behavior and reproduction of two terrestrial isopods, Armadillidium vulgare and Porcellio laevis. A. vulgare females were more cryptic than P. laevis females in both the presence and absence of ants, but in both species control animals were more cryptic than experimental animals exposed to ants. This likely resulted from increased movement in the presence of ants. Both species also avoided ventilated enclosures containing ants, but control animals not previously exposed to ants remained significantly further away. P. laevis also remained significantly further from ants than A. vulgare, suggesting that P. laevis more actively avoids potential predators. This is consistent with morphological differences between the two species: A. vulgare can roll into a sealed ball whereas the morphology of P. laevis permits swift locomotion. Furthermore, mortality rates of P. laevis were greater than A. vulgare when both were directly exposed to ants in the laboratory, and P. laevis suffered significantly more attacks than A. vulgare under experimental conditions. However, the length of the brooding period in A. vulgare was shorter in ant-exposed females than in controls, whereas experimental and control P. laevis females showed no such difference. This could be an adaptive trade-off for A. vulgare because in the late brooding period the distended marsupium can prevent rolling into a closed ball for protection. The results of this study underscore the relationships between morphology, behavior, and reproductive success.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07924259.2005.9652158

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Abzhanov A., 2000, Development, 127, 2239, 10.1242/dev.127.11.2239 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10224 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/beheco/9.6.552 · DOI
  4. Adamec R., 2001, effects of low frequency stimulation (LFS) of PAG on place preference and changes in ALB produced by predator stress. Behav. Brain Res, 120, 111
  5. Barmeyer R., 1975, Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci, 74, 30
  6. 10.1073/pnas.161285298 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/beheco/9.6.598 · DOI
  8. Deslippe R., 1995, ants. Zool. Jena, 99, 205
  9. 10.1006/anbe.2000.1433 · DOI
  10. 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.341 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1978.tb03360.x · DOI
  12. 10.1093/beheco/10.4.422 · DOI
  13. Hal G., 1982, Ohio J. Sci, 82, 94
  14. Kats L. B., 1998, Ecoscience, 5, 361, 10.1080/11956860.1998.11682468 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00042-2 · DOI
  16. Kawaji N., 1980, Sci. Bull. Fac. Agr. Kyushu Univ, 34, 123
  17. 10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0340:TDPIIT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  18. Kight S., 2001, Ent. News, 112, 112
  19. Kight S., 2002, J. Kans. Ent. Soc, 74, 166
  20. 10.2317/0307.09.1 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.2307/2407817 · DOI
  22. Lehman G., 1978, Growth, 42, 505
  23. 10.1139/z90-092 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Linzey D., 1998, J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc, 114, 125
  25. 10.1126/science.277.5328.901 · DOI
  26. 10.1023/A:1018408201713 · DOI
  27. Nyffleler M., 1981, Switzerland. Anz. Schaed. Pflanz. Umwelt, 54, 33
  28. 10.1093/beheco/13.3.386 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/08927014.1995.9522957 · DOI
  30. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1691 · DOI
  31. Siegel S., 1988, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
  32. 10.1086/324474 · DOI
  33. Sutton S., 1972, Woodlice. Ginn, London
  34. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06638.x · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0140-1963(05)80116-8 · DOI
  36. Whitaker J., 1986, Great Basin Nat, 46, 228

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
CASTILLO, M. E., & KIGHT, S. L.
Affiliations
Montclair State University (US)
Venue
Invertebrate Reproduction & Development
Published
2005-01
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
183-190
ISSN
  • 0792-4259 (ISSN-L)
  • 2157-0272
OpenAlex
W1967476072
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Invertebrate Reproduction & Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Keywords
terrestrial isopods, Armadillidium vulgare, Porcellio laevis, Tetramorium caespitum, predator avoidance, cryptic behavior, brooding period, reproductive success, ball rolling, mortality, ant predation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review