The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Response of terrestrial isopods,Armadillidium vulgare and Porcellio laevis(Isopoda: Oniscidea) to the ant Tetramorium caespitum: morphology, behavior and reproductive success
Abstract
Summary Little is known about the effects of predatory stress on reproduction in terrestrial isopods (Crustacea: Oniscidea). We studied direct and indirect influences of predatory ants Tetramorium caespitum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on the behavior and reproduction of two terrestrial isopods, Armadillidium vulgare and Porcellio laevis. A. vulgare females were more cryptic than P. laevis females in both the presence and absence of ants, but in both species control animals were more cryptic than experimental animals exposed to ants. This likely resulted from increased movement in the presence of ants. Both species also avoided ventilated enclosures containing ants, but control animals not previously exposed to ants remained significantly further away. P. laevis also remained significantly further from ants than A. vulgare, suggesting that P. laevis more actively avoids potential predators. This is consistent with morphological differences between the two species: A. vulgare can roll into a sealed ball whereas the morphology of P. laevis permits swift locomotion. Furthermore, mortality rates of P. laevis were greater than A. vulgare when both were directly exposed to ants in the laboratory, and P. laevis suffered significantly more attacks than A. vulgare under experimental conditions. However, the length of the brooding period in A. vulgare was shorter in ant-exposed females than in controls, whereas experimental and control P. laevis females showed no such difference. This could be an adaptive trade-off for A. vulgare because in the late brooding period the distended marsupium can prevent rolling into a closed ball for protection. The results of this study underscore the relationships between morphology, behavior, and reproductive success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Abzhanov A., 2000, Development, 127, 2239, 10.1242/dev.127.11.2239 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10224 · DOI
- 10.1093/beheco/9.6.552 · DOI
- Adamec R., 2001, effects of low frequency stimulation (LFS) of PAG on place preference and changes in ALB produced by predator stress. Behav. Brain Res, 120, 111
- Barmeyer R., 1975, Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci, 74, 30
- 10.1073/pnas.161285298 · DOI
- 10.1093/beheco/9.6.598 · DOI
- Deslippe R., 1995, ants. Zool. Jena, 99, 205
- 10.1006/anbe.2000.1433 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.341 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1978.tb03360.x · DOI
- 10.1093/beheco/10.4.422 · DOI
- Hal G., 1982, Ohio J. Sci, 82, 94
- Kats L. B., 1998, Ecoscience, 5, 361, 10.1080/11956860.1998.11682468 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00042-2 · DOI
- Kawaji N., 1980, Sci. Bull. Fac. Agr. Kyushu Univ, 34, 123
- 10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0340:TDPIIT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Kight S., 2001, Ent. News, 112, 112
- Kight S., 2002, J. Kans. Ent. Soc, 74, 166
- 10.2317/0307.09.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2407817 · DOI
- Lehman G., 1978, Growth, 42, 505
- 10.1139/z90-092 · DOI · Paper page
- Linzey D., 1998, J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc, 114, 125
- 10.1126/science.277.5328.901 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1018408201713 · DOI
- Nyffleler M., 1981, Switzerland. Anz. Schaed. Pflanz. Umwelt, 54, 33
- 10.1093/beheco/13.3.386 · DOI
- 10.1080/08927014.1995.9522957 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2001.1691 · DOI
- Siegel S., 1988, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
- 10.1086/324474 · DOI
- Sutton S., 1972, Woodlice. Ginn, London
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06638.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-1963(05)80116-8 · DOI
- Whitaker J., 1986, Great Basin Nat, 46, 228
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leclercq-Dransart, J., Pernin, C., Demuynck, S., Grumiaux, F., Lemière, S., & Leprêtre, A. (2019) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2018.11.005 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- CASTILLO, M. E., & KIGHT, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Montclair State University (US)
- ORCID
- KIGHT, SCOTT L.
- Venue
- Invertebrate Reproduction & Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 183-190
- ISSN
- 0792-4259 (ISSN-L)
- 2157-0272
- OpenAlex
- W1967476072
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Invertebrate Reproduction & Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Keywords
- terrestrial isopods, Armadillidium vulgare, Porcellio laevis, Tetramorium caespitum, predator avoidance, cryptic behavior, brooding period, reproductive success, ball rolling, mortality, ant predation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review