SPONTANEOUS AND LEARNED PREFERENCES FOR VISUAL FLOWER FEATURES IN A DIURNAL HAWKMOTH
Abstract
Macroglossum stellatarumis a diurnal member of the otherwise crepuscular sphin- gid family. The moths of this species are known to visit flowers of almost all colors, sizes, and patterns, but at a time, they are flower-constant. They are mainly attracted by the visual cues of flowers, odors being less important. The choices for flower-like objects differing in color, size, and pattern were analyzed in flight cages with free-flying animals of the laboratory livestock. Newly eclosed moths spontaneously choose 440 nm and 540 nm more frequently than other colors, radial patterns rather than ring patterns, and paper disks with a central spot more often than those without it. They are attracted to disks of about 32 mm diameter with a large distance to the background. These spontaneous choices enable them to find a first nectar reward. The moths can be trained to colors and sizes. They learn spectral colors much faster than paper colors, and their choices after color learning are compatible with true color vision phenomena. Most probably they also have a time-place memory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much of what we have learned about color preference in butterflies comes from laboratory studies, often explored through the use of artificial flowers.
“Much of what we have learned about color preference in butterflies comes from laboratory studies, often explored through the use of artificial flowers (Kelber & Pfaff, 1997; Kinoshita et al., 1999; Weiss, 1997; Weiss & Papaj, 2003).”
From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Kelber & Pfaff, 1997
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
Briggs, H. M., Graham, S., Switzer, C. M., & Hopkins, R. (2017) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/210377 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Much of what we have learned about color preference in butterflies comes from laboratory studies, often explored through the use of artificial flowers (Kelber & Pfaff, 1997; Kinoshita et al., 1999; Weiss, 1997; Weiss & Papaj, 2003).”
Background
- Authors
- Kelber, A., & Pfaff, M.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Lehrstuhl für Biokybernetik
- Venue
- Israel Journal of Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1997-05-13
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 235-245
- ISSN
- 0792-9978 (ISSN-L)
- 2223-8980
- OpenAlex
- W2053249129
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Israel Journal of Plant Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Keywords
- Macroglossum stellatarum, flower color preference, color learning, nectar reward, color vision, flower visitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review