The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Norms for grip strength in children aged 4-16 years
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to provide norms for grip strength in children. A total of 530 Swedish 4-16-y-olds was tested with the instrument Grippit. The instrument estimates peak grip strength over a 10s period, and sustained grip strength averaged across the 10s. The increase in grip strength with age was approximately parallel for boys and girls until 10 y of age, after which boys were significantly stronger than girls. Strong correlations existed between grip strength and the anthropometric measures weight, height and, in particular, hand length. Right-handed children were significantly stronger in their dominant hand, while left-handers did not show any strength difference between the hands. It is therefore suggested that when evaluating grip strength in left-handed children both hands should be assumed to be about equally strong, while right-handed children are expected to be up to 10% stronger with their right hand. Sustained grip strength was consistently about 80-85% of peak grip strength, with somewhat lower values in younger children. The present normative data for peak grip strength were slightly lower than 1980s' data from the USA and Australia, probably because of divergences in age grouping and in instruments used. CONCLUSION: Norms for grip strength including estimates of variation were provided for children aged 4-16 y. These data will enable therapists and physicians to compare a patient's score with the scores of normally developed children according to age, gender, handedness and body measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Cited by
Hand preference, performance abilities, and hand selection in children
Scharoun, S. M., & Bryden, P. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00082 · Cited by 273
Hulst, J. M., Huysentruyt, K., Gerasimidis, K., Shamir, R., Koletzko, B., Chourdakis, M., Fewtrell, M., Joosten, K. F., & Special Interest Group Clinical Malnutrition of ESPGHAN (2022) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000003437 · Cited by 59
Pediatric Co-Norms for Finger Tapping, Grip Strength, and Grooved Pegboard in a Community Sample
Wilcox, G., & Nordstokke, D. (2022) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617721000175 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Häger, C. K., & Rösblad, B.
- Venue
- Acta Paediatrica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 617-625
- ISSN
- 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062472078
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.