Cited by 56Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Patients’ perception of coercion in acute psychiatric wards. An intervention study

Sørgaard, Knut W.·2004·Nordic Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

A project based on the "Breakthrough series" for reducing the patients' perception of coercion in psychiatric acute wards is presented. Three different measures were chosen: 1) engagement of the patients in the formulation of the treatment plan, 2) frequent and regular joint patient and staff evaluations, and 3) renegotiation of treatment plans if necessary. A 5-week baseline was followed by a 12-week intervention period. Anonymously administered self-rating scales were used: the Coercion Ladder and the SPRI questionnaire. Two questions addressing aversive events (verbal and physical) were added. Participation rates were 86% (patients). Data from 190 admissions were analysed. The interventions resulted in only marginal changes in two of eight parameters (the staff's respect and understanding and on total satisfaction with the received help) and no change in experienced coercion. Seclusion accounted for 46% of the explained variance (62%) and participation in the formulation of the treatment plan for only 8% in regression analyses where perceived coercion was the dependent variable; a third of the patients had experienced insulting communication from the staff, and 10% physical harassment during their stay. It was concluded that: 1) the average value of experienced coercion was low, 2) taking part in the planning and evaluation of the treatment had marginal effect on experienced coercion, and 3) the main predictor of felt coercion was seclusion. Actions taken primarily to control behaviour were more strongly related to perceived coercion than aspects of compulsory treatment. More thorough analysis of seclusion and improved routines for its implementation are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08039480410005819

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients who experienced coercive measures such as physical restraint, mechanical restraint, chemical restraint, and seclusion were more likely to perceive coercion.

    “Patients who experienced coercive measures such as physical restraint [111,124,127], mechanical restraint [150], chemical restraint [124], and seclusion [58,124] were more likely to perceive coercion.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 56

Authors
Sørgaard, K. W.
Affiliations
Nordland Hospital Trust (NO)
Corresponding author
Sørgaard, Knut W.
Venue
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2004-06
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
299-304
ISSN
  • 0029-1455 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-9488
  • 1502-4725
OpenAlex
W1965384690
Cited by
56
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nordic Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
perceived coercion, acute psychiatric wards, Breakthrough Series, patient participation in treatment planning, seclusion, physical harassment, patient satisfaction, involuntary treatment
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Female, Hospital Departments, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Social Perception, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review