Cited by 118Retinal Development and DisordersVirus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Gene therapy for inherited retinal diseases: Progress and possibilities

Hu, Monica L, Edwards, Thomas L, O’Hare, Fleur, Hickey, Doron G, Wang, Jiang-Hui, Liu, Zhengyang, Ayton, Lauren N·2021·Clinical and Experimental Optometry

Abstract

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) comprise a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders affecting the retina. Caused by mutations in over 300 genes, IRDs result in visual impairment due to dysfunction and degeneration of photoreceptors, retinal pigment epithelium, or the choroid. Important photoreceptor IRDs include retinitis pigmentosa and Leber congenital amaurosis. Macular dystrophies include Stargardt and Best disease. Currently, IRDs are largely incurable but the landscape of treatment options is rapidly changing for these diseases which, untreated, result in severe visual impairment and blindness.Advances in DNA delivery to the retina and improved genetic diagnosis of IRDs have led to a new era of research into gene therapy for these vision-threatening disorders. Gene therapy is a compelling approach due to the monogenic nature of most IRDs, with the retina being a favourable target for administering genetic vectors due to its immunoprivileged environment, direct visibility, and multiple methods to assess sensitivity and function. Generally, retinal gene therapy involves a subretinal or intravitreal injection of a viral vector, which infects target cells to deliver a therapeutic gene, or transgene. A gene augmentation strategy introduces a functioning copy of a gene to restore expression of a mutated gene, whereas a gene-editing strategy aims to directly edit and correct the mutation. Common delivery vectors include adeno-associated virus (AAV) and lentivirus.Voretigene n…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08164622.2021.1880863

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 94 · Cited by 118

Authors
Hu, M. L., Edwards, T. L., O’Hare, F., Hickey, D. G., Wang, J.-H., Liu, Z., & Ayton, L. N.
Affiliations
  • The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Hu, Monica L
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Optometry
Published
2021-03-02
Volume
104
Issue
4
Pages
444-454
ISSN
  • 0816-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1444-0938
OpenAlex
W3135268126
Cited by
118
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Optometry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
gene therapy, inherited retinal disease, retinitis pigmentosa, Leber congenital amaurosis, Stargardt disease, Best disease, macular dystrophy, photoreceptor degeneration, adeno-associated virus vectors, lentiviral vectors, gene augmentation, genome editing, subretinal injection, intravitreal injection, voretigene neparvovec, genetic diagnosis, visual impairment
MeSH terms
Australia, Humans, Retina, Retinal Diseases, Genetic Therapy, Leber Congenital Amaurosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review