Gene therapy for inherited retinal diseases: Progress and possibilities
Abstract
Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) comprise a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders affecting the retina. Caused by mutations in over 300 genes, IRDs result in visual impairment due to dysfunction and degeneration of photoreceptors, retinal pigment epithelium, or the choroid. Important photoreceptor IRDs include retinitis pigmentosa and Leber congenital amaurosis. Macular dystrophies include Stargardt and Best disease. Currently, IRDs are largely incurable but the landscape of treatment options is rapidly changing for these diseases which, untreated, result in severe visual impairment and blindness.Advances in DNA delivery to the retina and improved genetic diagnosis of IRDs have led to a new era of research into gene therapy for these vision-threatening disorders. Gene therapy is a compelling approach due to the monogenic nature of most IRDs, with the retina being a favourable target for administering genetic vectors due to its immunoprivileged environment, direct visibility, and multiple methods to assess sensitivity and function. Generally, retinal gene therapy involves a subretinal or intravitreal injection of a viral vector, which infects target cells to deliver a therapeutic gene, or transgene. A gene augmentation strategy introduces a functioning copy of a gene to restore expression of a mutated gene, whereas a gene-editing strategy aims to directly edit and correct the mutation. Common delivery vectors include adeno-associated virus (AAV) and lentivirus.Voretigene n…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most therapeutic strategies currently under investigation for inherited retinal dystrophies are gene- or mutation-specific, which limits their broad applicability.
“Although several therapeutic strategies are currently under investigation, most are gene- or mutation-specific, which limits their broad applicability [5,6].”
From Precise CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12 Correction Using Lipoplexes in Retinal Models Derived from Patients with Inherited Retinal Dystrophies (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 94 · Cited by 118
- Authors
- Hu, M. L., Edwards, T. L., O’Hare, F., Hickey, D. G., Wang, J.-H., Liu, Z., & Ayton, L. N.
- Affiliations
- The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hu, Monica L
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical and Experimental Optometry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-03-02
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 444-454
- ISSN
- 0816-4622 (ISSN-L)
- 1444-0938
- OpenAlex
- W3135268126
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical and Experimental Optometry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Keywords
- gene therapy, inherited retinal disease, retinitis pigmentosa, Leber congenital amaurosis, Stargardt disease, Best disease, macular dystrophy, photoreceptor degeneration, adeno-associated virus vectors, lentiviral vectors, gene augmentation, genome editing, subretinal injection, intravitreal injection, voretigene neparvovec, genetic diagnosis, visual impairment
- MeSH terms
- Australia, Humans, Retina, Retinal Diseases, Genetic Therapy, Leber Congenital Amaurosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review