Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pressure Acid Leaching of Nickel Laterites: A Review

WHITTINGTON, B. I., MUIR*, D.·2000·Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review

Abstract

A review of the literature over the past 30 years on the processing of nickel laterites by high temperature acid leaching has been carried out to provide a better understanding of the mineralogy, leaching process chemistry and effect of operating conditions on nickel recovery, residue properties and scaling. Particular attention is paid to the leaching experience of the commercial Moa Bay plant and to the recently reported testwork and flowsheets associated with the three Western Australia lalerite plants that will be operating in 1999. It is shown that laterites can vary significantly in their mineralogy according to location, climate and depth, and that the main host minerals for nickel and cobalt can be either goethite (iron oxide) or nontronite (clay) or manganese oxides. The mechanism of leaching involves acid dissolution of the host mineral lattice followed by hydrolysis and precipitation (transformation) of a variety of insoluble oxides and sulphates of iron, aluminium and silica under the high temperature conditions. Optimum leaching conditions and final liquor composition varies according to the ore mineralogy. More fundamental studies have demonstrated that the rate of leaching and character of the residue is dependent upon the level of Mg, Mn and Cr in the ore, the Eh of the slurry and salinity of the process water. A number of studies are reviewed on the chemistry and precipitation of iron, aluminium, magnesium and silica to understand how the process conditions affect the solubility of the species and the nature of the scale which they form. Early work at Moa Bay indicates that the incorporation of chromium into alunite scale also affects the incorporation of silica and nickel and the settling of the residues. Various types of scale have been identified during different stages of leaching and possible means of minimising scale are discussed. The clay-rich nickel laterites in Western Australia differ from Moa Bay laterite in mineralogy and have comparatively high silica and low chromium content. Since no commercial plant has previously processed such ores or used saline process water, there is little published in this area. It is therefore recommended that further research be carried out on understanding the process chemistry and species equilibrium from various ore types under autoclave conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08827500008914177

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
WHITTINGTON, B. I., & MUIR*, D.
Venue
Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review
Published
2000-10
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
527-599
ISSN
  • 0882-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7401
OpenAlex
W2071620750
Cited by
260
References
15
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pressure Acid Leaching of Nickel Laterites: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08827500008914177
The paper
WHITTINGTON, B. I., & MUIR*, D. (2000). Pressure Acid Leaching of Nickel Laterites: A Review. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827500008914177

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.