Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Control of Asbestos Exposure during Brake Drum Service

Sheehy, John W., Cooper, Thomas C., O'brien, Dennis M.·1989·Applied Industrial Hygiene

Abstract

An estimated 150,000 brake mechanics and garage workers in the U.S. are potentially exposed to asbestos, a known health hazard. Earlier studies of airborne asbestos exposures to mechanics during brake maintenance operations showed overexposure to asbestos fibers during brake servicing, especially brake assembly cleaning. Most brake service operations are performed by small businesses that lack resources to evaluate control devices. The results from the evaluation of five control methods for containing asbestos brake dust during brake maintenance are presented. These controls included two commercial enclosure devices with ventilation provided by high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter-equipped vacuums, a HEPA filter-equipped vacuum cleaner without an enclosure, a wet brush/recycle system which recirculated the cleaning solution, and an aerosol spray for wetting the brake assembly. Detailed surveys of the controls were conducted at five separate facilities during actual brake servicing operations to automobiles, pickup trucks, vans, and vehicles with a four-wheel rear axle. Personal and area air samples collected during brake repair to each vehicle were analyzed by phase contrast microscopy (PCM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Personal sampling results for the brake mechanics show that concentrations determined by PCM analysis ranged from less than 0.004 f/cc to 0.016 f/cc. All exposures were below the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NI…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08828032.1989.10389934

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 1977, Survey Analysis and Supplemental Tables. In: National Occupational Hazard Survey, Vol. III. DHEW (NIOSH) Pub. No. 78-114
  2. Reid R., 1987, Occupational Hazards, 39
  3. Roberts D. R., 1982, Asbestos Exposure Assessment for Brake Mechanics. Industrywide Study Report 32.4
  4. 1987, Methods 7400 and 7402. In: NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 3rd ed., Vol.2. DHHS (NIOSH) Pub. No. 84-100
  5. 10.1021/es00117a004 · DOI
  6. 1986, Fed. Reg, 51, 22612
  7. 1976, Revised Recommended Asbestos Standard, p. 93. DHEW (NIOSH) No. 77-169
  8. Roberts D. R., 1980, Industrial Hygiene Report Asbestos—Reading Brake and Alignment Service. Industrywide Study Report 32.56
  9. Roberts D. R., 1980, Industrial Hygiene Report Asbestos—Allied Brake Shop. Industrywide Study Report 32.58
  10. Stanton M. F., 1981, J. Natl. Cancer Inst, 67, 965
  11. Pott F., 1978, Staub-Reinhalt. Luft, 38, 486

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sheehy, J. W., Cooper, T. C., & O'brien, D. M.
Venue
Applied Industrial Hygiene
Published
1989-12
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
313-319
ISSN
0882-8032
Cited by
13
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review