A systematic review of academic interventions for students with disabilities in Online Higher Education
Open accessAbstract
The development of new educational environments based on the use of ICT has enabled the possibility to improve access and involvement for students with disabilities at the university level. Hence, this systematic review attempts to synthesise the main findings of previous interventions aimed to promote the inclusion of these students in Online Higher Education, as well as to analyse their contribution on the students’ academic success, by considering the principles of both Universal Instructional Design and Universal Design for Learning. A systematic search was conducted in four databases (WOS, Scopus, ERIC, and ProQuest) following the PRISMA-P statement. This search yielded 15 articles according to the defined criteria. Four thematic categories were identified throughout a thematic synthesis: Accessibility, support, socialisation, and academic success. The findings show that both accessibility and support are important factors for promoting the disabled students’ academic success in Online Higher Education but also highlight the need to apply the Universal Design in the whole system. Furthermore, the issues of academic support, inclusive pedagogical practices, and socialisation should be deeply analysed to inquire about their contribution to the students with disabilities’ academic success. Lastly, the limitations of this study and future implication for research are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The inclusion of students with disabilities in online higher education results in a combination of pedagogical, technological, psychological, and emotional factors.
“The inclusion of students with disabilities in online higher education results in a combination of pedagogical, technological, psychological, and emotional factors (Reyes et al., 2022).”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Reyes et al., 2022
Cites
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223 · see citing works
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pierrès, O., Darvishy, A., & Christen, M. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13134-8 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“The inclusion of students with disabilities in online higher education results in a combination of pedagogical, technological, psychological, and emotional factors (Reyes et al., 2022).”
Bartolo, P. A., Borg, M., Callus, A.-M., De Gaetano, A., Mangiafico, M., Mazzacano D’Amato, E., Sammut, C., Vella Vidal, R., & Vincent, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1218120 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Systematic Review (2000 to 2021) of Online Accessibility Research in Higher Education
She, L., & Martin, F. (2022) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923647.2022.2081438 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Vindigni, G. (2026) · European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning · doi:10.59324/ejceel.2026.4(4).05
- Authors
- Reyes, J. I., Meneses, J., & Melián, E.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Reyes, José Israel
- Venue
- European Journal of Special Needs Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-04-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 569-586
- ISSN
- 0885-6257 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-591X
- OpenAlex
- W3150434476
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- European Journal of Special Needs Education (publishedVersion)
- O2 - Repositori Institucional (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Fundació per a la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (2019/00003/001/006/006)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- students with disabilities, online higher education, academic intervention, Universal Design for Learning, universal instructional design, inclusive education, accessibility, academic support, socialization, academic performance, inclusive pedagogy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review