Cited by 27Health Sciences Research and EducationPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsHealth Policy Implementation Science

Attitudes, perceptions, and utilization of evidence-based practices in residential care

Open access
James, Sigrid, Thompson, Ronald, Sternberg, Neal, Schnur, Elizabeth, Ross, Jordan, Butler, Linda, Triplett, Dawn, Puett, Lesley +1 more·2015·Residential Treatment for Children & Youth

Abstract

This study reports on results of a national survey conducted in the United States about the attitudes, perceptions and utilization of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in residential care settings. Seventy-five of 118 member agencies (63.6% response rate) of a voluntary national residential care association responded to a web-administered structured survey, which included the Evidence-Based Practices Attitude Scale (Aarons, 2004). Results show overwhelmingly positive attitudes toward EBPs. Concerns were reported mainly with regard to cost and impeding a client-driven practice approach. The study also showed a high degree of utilization of EBPs with over 88 percent of programs reporting the use of at least one practice they considered to be evidence-based. Altogether 53 different practices were reported although it is unknown at this point whether practices were delivered with fidelity. Behaviorally-based and trauma-focused interventions constituted the most common interventions used by residential care agencies. Practices were subsequently validated against four national clearinghouse sites, indicating that only slightly over half of all reported practices had been evaluated by at least one clearinghouse and rated as having some research evidence for effectiveness. Divergent views about what practices are evidence-based point to the need for continued discussion between the practice and research fields about conceptualizations of evidence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0886571x.2015.1046275

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This study adds to the relatively sparse literature on organization-level interventions to improve service quality and positive outcomes for children in group care settings.

    “This study adds to the relatively sparse literature on organizationlevel interventions to improve service quality and positive outcomes for children in group care settings (James et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Aarons GA McDonald EJ Sheehan AK Walrath-Greene CM Confirmatory factor analysis of the Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) in a geographically diverse sample of community mental health providers Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Services Research 2007 34 5 465 469 17619137
  2. Ainsworth F Hansen PA A dream come true - no more residential care. A corrective note International Journal of Social Welfare 2005 14 195 199
  3. Barth RP Residential care: From here to eternity International Journal of Social Welfare 2005 14 3 158 162
  4. Chamberlain P Burns B Hoagwood K Treatment foster care Community treatment for youth: Evidence-based interventions for severe emotional and behavioral disorders 2002 New York Oxford University Press 117 138
  5. Chambless DL Hollon S Defining empirically supported therapies Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1998 66 1 7 18 9489259
  6. Chorpita BF Daleiden EL Weisz JR Identifying and selecting the common elements of evidence based interventions: A distillation and matching model Mental Health Services Research 2005 7 1 5 20 15832690
  7. Colton M Vanstone M Walby C Victimization, care and justice: Reflections on the experiences of victims/survivors involved in large-scale historical investigations of child sexual abuse in residential institutions British Journal of Social Work 2002 32 5 541 551
  8. Courtney ME Iwaniec D Residential care of children: Comparative perspectives 2009 New York Oxford University Press
  9. DiGennaro Reed FD Reed DD Towards an understanding of evidence-based practice Journal of Early & Intensive Behavior Intervention 2008 5 2 20 29
  10. Dishion TJ McCord J Poulin F When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior American Psychologist 1999 54 9 755 764 10510665
  11. Drake RE Goldman H LEff HS Lehman AF Dixon L Mueser KT Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings Psychiatric Services 2001 52 179 182 11157115
  12. Frensch KM Cameron G Treatment of choice or a last resort? A review of residential mental health placements for children and youth Child & Youth Care Forum 2002 31 5 307 339
  13. Gambrill ED Evidence-based practice: Sea change or the emperor’s new clothes? Journal of Social Work Education 2003 39 3 23
  14. Henggeler SW Schoenwald SK Borduin CM Rowland MD Cunningham PB Multisystemic therapy for antisocial behavior in children and adolescents 2009 2nd New York The Guilford Press
  15. Hobbs GF Hobbs CF Wynne JM Abuse of children in foster and residential care Child Abuse & Neglect 1999 23 12 1239 1252 10626608
  16. Hudson J Nutter R Galaway B A Survey of North American Specialist Foster Family Care Programs Social Service Review 1992 66 1 50 63
  17. Hurley K Trout A Chmelka MB Burns BJ Epstein MH Thompson RW Daly D The changing mental health needs of youth admitted to residential group home care: Comparing mental health status at admission in 1995 and 2004 Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 2009 17 3 164 176
  18. James S What works in group care? A structured review of treatment models for group home and residential care Children and Youth Services Review 2011 33 308 321 22468014 PMC3314708
  19. James S Alemi Q Zepeda V Effectiveness and implementation of evidence-based practices in residential care settings Children and Youth Services Review 2013 35 642 656 23606781 PMC3629969
  20. Leichtman M Residential treatment of children and adolescents: Past, present and future The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 2006 76 3 285 294 16981807
  21. Melas CD Zampetakis LA Dimopoulou A Moustakis V Evaluating the properties of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) in health care Psychological Assessment 2012 24 4 22409449
  22. Rosen A Proctor E Roberts AR Greene GJ Standards for evidence-based social work practice Social Workers’ Desk Reference 2002 New York Oxford University Press 743 747
  23. Rycroft-Malone J Seers K Titchen A Harvey G Kitson A McCormack B What counts as evidence in evidence-based practice? Journal of Advanced Nursing 2004 47 1 81 90 15186471
  24. Sackett DL Rosenberg WM Gray JA Haynes RB Richardson WS Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t British Medical Journal 1996 312 71 72 8555924 PMC2349778
  25. Slesnick N Prestopnik JL Comparison of family therapy outcome with alcohol- abusing, runaway adolescents Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 2009 35 3 255 277 19522781 PMC2697451
  26. Torrey WC Drake RE Dixon L Burns BJ Flynn L Rush AJ Implementing evidence-based practices for persons with severe mental illnesses Psychiatric Services 2001 52 45 50 11141527
  27. Trout AL Lambert M Epstein M Tyler P Stewart M Thompson RW Daly D Comparison of On the Way Home aftercare supports to usual care following discharge from a residential setting: An exploratory pilot randomized controlled trial Child Welfare 2013 92 27 45 24818429
  28. Whittaker JK The re-invention of residential treatment: An agenda for research and practice Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America 2004 13 2 267 278 15062345
  29. Wines EC The state of prisons and of child-saving institutions in the civilised world 1880 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  30. Witkin S Harrison WD Whose evidence and for what purpose? Social Work 2001 46 4 293 296 11682970

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
James, S., Thompson, R., Sternberg, N., Schnur, E., Ross, J., Butler, L., Triplett, D., Puett, L., & Muirhead, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Kassel (DE)
  • Boys Town (US)
Corresponding author
James, Sigrid
Venue
Residential Treatment for Children & Youth
Published
2015-04-03
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
144-166
ISSN
  • 0886-571X (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0358
OpenAlex
W1590498892
Cited by
27
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Residential Treatment for Children & Youth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH K01MH077732-01A1, R25MH080916-01A2)
  • Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research& Development Service, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI)
  • Implementation Research Institute (IRI)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
evidence-based practice, residential care, attitudes toward evidence-based practice, trauma-focused interventions, research-practice gap, cost barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review