Prevalence and correlates of sexual morbidity in long-term breast cancer survivors
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer survivors report adverse sexual effects (sexual morbidity) such as disrupted sexual function, sexual distress and body dissatisfaction. However, most studies have failed to evaluate the persistence of these effects in long-term survivors. The present study comprehensively assessed the prevalence and predictors of sexual/body image problems among survivors three or more years post diagnosis. DESIGN/OUTCOME MEASURES: Eighty-three breast cancer survivors completed surveys a median of seven years post diagnosis. Survey items probed demographic, diagnostic and clinical information, in addition to sexual activity, sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI]), body image, and distress regarding body changes and sexual problems (Female Sexual Distress Scale-revised; FSDS-R). RESULTS: Seventy-seven percent of all participants and 60% of sexually active participants qualified for sexual dysfunction based on the FSFI. Between 37 and 51% met criteria for female sexual dysfunction, based on two FSDS-R clinical cut-offs. Body satisfaction was worse than normative values, while body change stress was mid-range. Notable sexual morbidity predictors included mastectomy, which was associated with worse sexual/body change distress, and post-treatment weight gain, which predicted greater body dissatisfaction/body change stress. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer survivors report substantial sexual morbidity years after treatment, especially after mastectomy or post-treatment weight gain. Breast cancer patients and their providers should be aware of these potential sexual effects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Breast loss through mastectomy changes appearance and sensual sensations, causing difficulty recognizing themselves.
“Breast loss through a mastectomy procedure changes the appearance and sensual sensations of an individual, and also causes survivors to have difficulty recognizing themselves [35,36].”
From Empowerment in the treatment of fatigue in breast cancer patients (2021) · cites this paper as [35]
The Discussion (Sexual morbidity correlates; page unavailable) identifies mastectomy as a predictor of sexual distress and body-change stress. The paper also reports perceived physical unattractiveness after mastectomy, supporting the appearance aspect. Our copy does not establish altered sensual sensations or difficulty recognizing oneself, and the claim presents these as causal effects. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBreast cancer survivors of younger age; presenting negative body image, low perceived sexual attractiveness, poorer marital/relationship satisfaction or relationship distress, facing partner's fear of sexual intercourse, depression, psychological distress, vasomotor symptoms, lymphedema, weight gain, tiredness and pain; having performed a combination of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hormone ther
“Breast cancer survivors of younger age; presenting negative or body image disturbance, low perceived sexual attractiveness, poorer marital/relationship satisfaction or relationship distress, facing partner's fear of sexual intercourse, depression, psychological distress, vasomotor symptoms, lymphedema, weight gain, tiredness and pain; having performed a combination of RT, CT and HT, treatment with”
From A guided internet-delivered individually-tailored ACT-influenced cognitive behavioural intervention to improve psychosocial outcomes in breast cancer survivors (iNNOVBC): Study protocol (2019) · cites this paper as Raggio et al., 2014
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 153
- Authors
- Raggio, G. A., Butryn, M. L., Arigo, D., Mikorski, R., & Palmer, S. C.
- Affiliations
- Drexel University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Raggio, Greer A.
- Venue
- Psychology & Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01-28
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 632-650
- ISSN
- 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-8321
- PMC
- PMC5521019
- OpenAlex
- W2050843521
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Drexel University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH063172)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- breast cancer survivors, sexual dysfunction, female sexual dysfunction, body image, body dissatisfaction, sexual distress, mastectomy, long-term survivorship, Female Sexual Function Index, Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Body Image, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Prevalence, Survivors, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review