Cited by 140Cleft Lip and Palate ResearchOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments

Psychological adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate: A narrative review of the literature

Open access
Stock, Nicola Marie, Feragen, Kristin Billaud·2016·Psychology & Health

Abstract

Objective Adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) is multifaceted, involving several domains of psychological and social functioning. A substantial increase in research in this area has been evident in recent years, along with a preliminary shift in how adjustment to CL/P is conceptualised and measured. An updated and comprehensive review of the literature is needed in light of the rapidly expanding and changing field. Design A narrative review of 148 quantitative and qualitative studies published between January 2004 and July 2015. Main outcome measures Findings are presented according to five key domains of adjustment: Developmental Trajectory, Behaviour, Emotional Well-being, Social Experiences and Satisfaction with Appearance and Treatment. Data pertaining to General Psychological Well-being were also examined. Results The overall impact of CL/P on psychological adjustment appears to be low. Nonetheless, the review demonstrates the complexity of findings both within and across domains, and highlights recurring methodological challenges. Conclusions Research findings from the last decade are considered to be largely inconclusive, although some areas of emerging consensus and improvements in the approaches used were identified. Efforts to collect data from large, representative and longitudinal samples, which are comparable across studies and encompassing of the patient perspective, should be doubled.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2016.1143944

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 177 · Cited by 140

Authors
Stock, N. M., & Feragen, K. B.
Affiliations
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Stock, Nicola Marie
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2016-04-15
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
777-813
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W2288063155
Cited by
140
References
177
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
cleft lip and palate, psychological adjustment, emotional well-being, social experience, appearance satisfaction, treatment satisfaction, developmental trajectories, behavior, psychological well-being, patient perspectives
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, Humans, Narration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review