Psychological adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate: A narrative review of the literature
Open accessAbstract
Objective Adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) is multifaceted, involving several domains of psychological and social functioning. A substantial increase in research in this area has been evident in recent years, along with a preliminary shift in how adjustment to CL/P is conceptualised and measured. An updated and comprehensive review of the literature is needed in light of the rapidly expanding and changing field. Design A narrative review of 148 quantitative and qualitative studies published between January 2004 and July 2015. Main outcome measures Findings are presented according to five key domains of adjustment: Developmental Trajectory, Behaviour, Emotional Well-being, Social Experiences and Satisfaction with Appearance and Treatment. Data pertaining to General Psychological Well-being were also examined. Results The overall impact of CL/P on psychological adjustment appears to be low. Nonetheless, the review demonstrates the complexity of findings both within and across domains, and highlights recurring methodological challenges. Conclusions Research findings from the last decade are considered to be largely inconclusive, although some areas of emerging consensus and improvements in the approaches used were identified. Efforts to collect data from large, representative and longitudinal samples, which are comparable across studies and encompassing of the patient perspective, should be doubled.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 177 · Cited by 140
- Authors
- Stock, N. M., & Feragen, K. B.
- Affiliations
- University of the West of England (GB)
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Stock, Nicola Marie
- Venue
- Psychology & Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-04-15
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 777-813
- ISSN
- 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-8321
- OpenAlex
- W2288063155
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 177
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2017-07-28)
- Open access
- green
- eprints.uwe.ac.uk
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- cleft lip and palate, psychological adjustment, emotional well-being, social experience, appearance satisfaction, treatment satisfaction, developmental trajectories, behavior, psychological well-being, patient perspectives
- MeSH terms
- Emotional Adjustment, Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, Humans, Narration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review