Cited by 246Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourInformation and Cyber Security

Understanding Situational Online Information Disclosure as a Privacy Calculus

Open access
Li, Han, Sarathy, Rathindra, Xu, Heng·2010·Journal of Computer Information Systems

Abstract

The effect of situational factors is largely ignored by current studies on information privacy. This paper theorized and empirically tested how an individual's decision-making on information disclosure is driven by competing situational benefits and risk factors. The results of this study indicate that, in the context of an e-commerce transaction with an unfamiliar vendor, information disclosure is the result of competing influences of exchange benefits and two types of privacy beliefs (privacy protection belief and privacy risk belief). In addition, the effect of monetary rewards is dependent upon the fairness of information exchange. Monetary rewards could undermine information disclosure when information collected has low relevance to the purpose of the e-commerce transaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08874417.2010.11645450

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 246

Authors
Li, H., Sarathy, R., & Xu, H.
Affiliations
  • Minnesota State University Moorhead (US)
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Computer Information Systems
Published
2010-09
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
62-71
ISSN
  • 0887-4417 (ISSN-L)
  • 2380-2057
OpenAlex
W2522559588
Cited by
246
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
24.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Computer Information Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Journal of Computer Information Systems
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
information disclosure, privacy calculus, situational factors, online privacy, e-commerce, monetary rewards, perceived fairness, information relevance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review