Cited by 49Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesEducation and Technology Integration

An Experimental Study of Animation, Mathematics Achievement, and Attitude Toward Computer-Assisted Instruction

Szabo, Michael, Poohkay, Brent·1996·Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Abstract

Animation has been used in instruction for many years. However, recent advances permit the creation of desktop animations by a wider range of instructors. In order to understand the effects of animation on student learning and student reaction to it, an experimental study was conducted. A one-hour lesson on the 10th-grade mathematics topic of construction of triangles using a compass was developed in three instructional formats: (a) text only, (b) text plus static graphics, and (c) text plus animation. One hundred seventy four undergraduate elementary education majors were divided into high and low math achievement levels based on a pretest and randomly assigned to one of the three instructional groups. On a test designed to measure ability to construct triangles and identify trigonometric concepts, the animation group scored 21% and 35% higher than the graphics and text group, respectively. The graphics group scored higher than the text-only group. Attitude toward learning from CAI was equivalent for the animation and graphics group and was higher than for the text-only group. It is concluded that when animation is used to present content and is directly related to the objectives of learning, substantial gains in learning are possible, and students like it better than textual presentations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08886504.1996.10782173

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research studies have not been able to conclude that animated visualization is any more effective than static visualization.

    “Despite the overwhelming excitement for animated visualization, research studies have not been able to conclude that it is any more effective than static visualization.”
  • Szabo and Poohkay reviewed 20 studies and found half showed a significant effect in favor of animation while the other half showed no significant differences.

    “Szabo and Poohkay (1996) reviewed 20 studies that investigated animation in the CBI environment and found that half of the studies show a significant effect in favor of animation (Alesandrini & Rigney, 1981; Kaiser, Proffitt, & Anderson, 1985; Rieber, 1989; Rieber, Boyce & Assad, 1990) while the other half showed no significant differences (Caraballo, 1985; King, 1975; Moore, Nawrocki, & Simutis,”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szabo, M., & Poohkay, B.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
Journal of Research on Computing in Education
Published
1996-03
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
390-402
ISSN
0888-6504 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1595389468
Cited by
49
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research on Computing in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
Keywords
computer-assisted instruction, mathematics achievement, triangle construction, static graphics, elementary education majors, trigonometry, instructional media comparison, 10th grade mathematics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review