Creative bibliotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): a systematic review
Abstract
Creative bibliotherapy – or the guided reading of fiction or poetry – is used widely in mental healthcare settings. In the UK, partnerships between private organizations, libraries, and the NHS support reading groups for better mental health and social cohesion. In the USA, veterans’ reading support groups are common and private lifestyle consultancies offer services that match clients to books for general well-being. Considering the widespread employment of creative bibliotherapy, this systematic review was conducted to explore its effectiveness in reducing symptoms in adults with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Both randomized and non-randomized trials were included in the extensive search but no high-quality controlled trials were found. Importantly, there is no evidence to suggest harms from the trial designs related to creative bibliotherapy and some low-quality and qualitative studies indicated this intervention may help PTSD symptoms. High quality randomized controlled trials should be conducted urgently.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Glavin and Montgomery found no therapeutic effects of creative bibliotherapy.
“However, results do not seem to generalise, with a meta-analysis by Montgomery and Maunders [26] finding only minor evidence for the efficacy of creative bibliotherapy in addressing PTSD, and Glavin and Montgomery [27] finding no therapeutic effects at all.”
From Five studies evaluating the impact on mental health and mood of recalling, reading, and discussing fiction (2022) · cites this paper as Glavin and Montgomery [27]
Creative bibliotherapy has been used in mental health and social care to improve outcomes.
“Creative bibliotherapy has been used in mental health and social care to improve outcomes”
From Recent developments in bibliotherapy for adolescent depression (2025) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Glavin, C. E. Y., & Montgomery, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Montgomery, Paul
- ORCID
- Montgomery, Paul
- Venue
- Journal of Poetry Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-01-19
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-107
- ISSN
- 0889-3675 (ISSN-L)
- 1567-2344
- OpenAlex
- W2573796696
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Poetry Therapy (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Oxford
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, guided reading, fiction, poetry, book clubs, veterans, mental health interventions, intervention effectiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review