Cited by 12Enzyme Production and CharacterizationPapaya Research and ApplicationsPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rapid Extraction of Pawpaw Juice with the Application of Locally Produced Pectic Enzymes from Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ATCC 51712

Djokoto, David, Dzogbefia, V.P., Oldham, J.H.·2006·Food Biotechnology

Abstract

Pawpaw (Carica papaya) fruit is highly perishable; hence, conversion into a value-added product such as juice concentrate will be useful. Pawpaw fruit is, however, high in pectin; therefore, its juice extraction is difficult without an extraction aid such as the addition of pectic enzymes. Our laboratory has developed a simple enzymatic method that enables the extraction of pawpaw juice with considerable ease. Pectic enzymes were obtained from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ATCC 52712) cultured in pawpaw juice for 6 days at room temperature (25–28°C) and centrifuged to obtain the enzyme in the supernatant. Addition of this enzyme (32 mg total protein) to 200 g pawpaw mash and incubation for 30 min resulted in significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the viscosity of the mash with corresponding increases in the flow rate of free-run juice (85%). Simultaneously, large increases in the volume of free-run juice (180%) over the controls were obtained. Since the overall increase in total juice volume was only 35% as compared with 180% for volume of free–run juice and 80% increase in flow rate for free–run juice, it was concluded that the major effect of the enzyme treatment on pawpaw juice extraction is on the decrease in processing time as a result of the degradation of the pectin in the fruit flesh.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08905430500523970

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Baumann J.W., 1981, Enzymes and Food Processing, 129, 10.1007/978-94-011-6740-6_8 · DOI
  2. 10.1023/A:1018536519325 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/08905439609549958 · DOI
  4. 10.1081/FBT-100103892 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lanzarini G., 1989, Biotechnology Applications in Beverage Production, 189, 10.1007/978-94-009-1113-0_13 · DOI
  6. Lowry O.H., 1951, J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/ac60070a036 · DOI
  8. Muthukrishnan C.R., 1990, Fruits, Tropical and Subtropical, 302
  9. Richardson T., 1992, Food Chemistry

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Djokoto, D., Dzogbefia, V. P., & Oldham, J. H.
Affiliations
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
Corresponding author
Dzogbefia, V.P.
Venue
Food Biotechnology
Published
2006-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
31-41
ISSN
  • 0890-5436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4249
OpenAlex
W1977421261
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Papaya Research and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Keywords
pawpaw, Carica papaya, juice extraction, pectic enzymes, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, pectin degradation, juice viscosity, fruit processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review