Cited by 29Evolution and Paleontology StudiesPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology

Effect of durophagy on drilling predation: a case study of Cenozoic molluscs from North America

Chattopadhyay, Devapriya, Baumiller, Tomasz K.·2010·Historical Biology

Abstract

Drilling predation represents one of the most widely studied biotic interactions preserved in the fossil record, and complete and incomplete drill holes have been commonly used to explore spatial and temporal patterns of this phenomenon. While such patterns are generally viewed solely in terms of the interactions between predator and prey, they might also be affected by extrinsic ecological factors. Recent experiments have demonstrated that in the presence of a secondary predator (crab), the incomplete drilling frequency increases indicating increasing abandonment of the prey, and drilling frequency decreases implying a decrease in successful attacks. Here, we tested whether the effect of secondary predators on drilling frequencies can be detected in the fossil record. Using fossil molluscs from six Plio-Pleistocene localities, we found that repair scar frequencies, a proxy for activity of durophagous predators, correlate directly with incomplete drill hole frequencies and inversely with complete drill hole frequencies. These results suggest that the activity and success of drilling predators is influenced not just by the prey, but also by secondary predators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08912961003600445

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chattopadhyay, D., & Baumiller, T. K.
Affiliations
  • University of West Georgia (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Chattopadhyay, Devapriya
Venue
Historical Biology
Published
2010-07-05
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
367-379
ISSN
  • 0891-2963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1029-2381
OpenAlex
W1971811537
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Historical Biology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Geological Society of America
  • Conchologists of America
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
drilling predation, durophagy, drill holes, predator-prey interactions, fossil molluscs, crab predation, Cenozoic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review