The DOI matches its Crossref record.
TRANSPORT PHENOMENA IN STACKS OF INTERRUPTED PARALLEL-PLATE SURFACES
Abstract
A scale-up model of interrupted fin surfaces in compact exchanger cores is employed for pressure loss and heat transfer study in a wind tunnel. Offset strip- and slotted-type interruptions are considered together with the plain plate fin for comparison. The physical dimensions of the fin surfaces and enclosing core and the flow rate are varied to closely simulate both the physical and operating conditions in actual compact heat exchangers. It is found that the offset strip fin is superior to both the slotted and plain straight fins in heat transfer/ pressure drop performance. The f and j correlation equations are derived for the offset strip fin cores. Two kinds of performance enhancement are identified and their mechanisms are explored.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Figure 9 shows good agreement between the plotted experimental data and the correlations of Mochizuki et al. even though the plotted experimental data are out of the correlation limitations of Mochizuki et al.
“Even with the fact that the plotted experimental data are out of the correlation limitations of Mochizuki et al. [84], Figure 9 shows a good agreement between them leading to low caution when using these correlations.”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [84]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Liang C. Y., 1976, Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Flow Visualization, 63
- Mochizuki S., 1982, Flow Visualization II, 99
- 10.1115/1.3450298 · DOI
- Lee C. P., 1978, Heat Transfer 1978, 2, 589
- 10.1016/0017-9310(78)90105-9 · DOI
- Kays W. M., 1984, Compact Heat Exchangers, 3ded.
- 10.1016/0017-9310(85)90232-7 · DOI
- 10.1115/1.3244317 · DOI
- 10.1115/1.3450654 · DOI
- 10.1016/0094-4548(78)90011-5 · DOI
- Mochizuki S., Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
- 10.1115/1.3450412 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qasem, N. A. A., & Zubair, S. M. (2018) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.104 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- MOCHIZUKI, S., YAGI, Y., & YANG, W.-J.
- Affiliations
- Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (JP)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Experimental Heat Transfer
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-140
- ISSN
- 0891-6152 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0480
- OpenAlex
- W2026788295
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental Heat Transfer (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat transfer and supercritical fluids
- Keywords
- offset strip fins, compact heat exchangers, pressure drop, heat transfer, scale-up model, fin spacing, performance improvement, wind tunnel testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
