Mini-review: Microbial coaggregation: ubiquity and implications for biofilm development
Open accessAbstract
Coaggregation is the specific recognition and adherence of genetically distinct microorganisms. Because most biofilms are polymicrobial communities, there is potential for coaggregation to play an integral role in spatiotemporal biofilm development and the moderation of biofilm community composition. However, understanding of the mechanisms contributing to coaggregation and the relevance of coaggregation to biofilm ecology is at a very early stage. The purpose of this review is to highlight recent advances in the understanding of microbial coaggregation within different environments and to describe the possible ecological ramifications of such interactions. Bacteria that coaggregate with many partner species within different environments will be highlighted, including oral streptococci and oral bridging organisms such as fusobacteria, as well as the freshwater sphingomonads and acinetobacters. Irrespective of environment, it is proposed that coaggregation is essential for the orchestrated development of multi-species biofilms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biofilm formation is initiated by specific primary colonizers that adhere to mucosal and dental surfaces and serve as a foundation for other bacteria through specific adhesin-receptor interactions.
“Biofilm formation is initiated by specific bacteria that are considered ‘primary colonizers’ because they adhere to mucosal and dental surfaces and serve as a foundation to which other bacteria can attach and join the community through specific adhesin-receptor interactions [1–3].”
From Coaggregation of oral pathogens by postbiotic lactobacilli (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
In the oral cavity, coaggregation plays a crucial role in the formation and stability of dental biofilm and thus influences oral health and disease.
“In the oral cavity, coaggregation plays a crucial role in the formation and stability of dental biofilm, and it thus influences oral health and disease.”
From Coaggregation of oral pathogens by postbiotic lactobacilli (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 143 · Cited by 104
- Authors
- Katharios-Lanwermeyer, S., Xi, C., Jakubovics, N. S., & Rickard, A. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rickard, A.H.
- Venue
- Biofouling
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-11-24
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1235-1251
- ISSN
- 0892-7014 (ISSN-L)
- 1029-2454
- OpenAlex
- W2087207682
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 143
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Biofouling (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Keywords
- biofilm growth, polymicrobial communities, bacterial adhesion, biofilm community composition, oral streptococci, Fusobacteria, Acinetobacter, polymicrobial biofilms, biofilm ecology
- MeSH terms
- Bacteria, Bacterial Adhesion, Fresh Water, Mouth, Biofilms, Microbial Consortia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review