Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comparison of Particle-Particle, Particle-Mesh and Ewald Methods for Calculating Electrostatic Interactions in Periodic Molecular Systems

Luty, Brock A., Davis, Malcolm E., Tironi, Ilario G., Van Gunsteren, Wilfred F.·1994·Molecular Simulation

Abstract

We compare the Particle-Particle Particle-Mesh (PPPM) and Ewald methods for calculating electrostatic interactions in periodic molecular systems. A brief comparison of the theories shows that the methods are very similar differing mainly in the technique which is used to perform the “k-space” or mesh calculation. Because the PPPM utilizes the highly efficient numerical Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) method it requires significantly less computational effort than the Ewald method and scales almost linearly with system size.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08927029408022004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
Luty, B. A., Davis, M. E., Tironi, I. G., & Van Gunsteren, W. F.
Venue
Molecular Simulation
Published
1994-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
11-20
ISSN
  • 0892-7022 (ISSN-L)
  • 1029-0435
OpenAlex
W2058287541
Cited by
230
References
1
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Particle-Particle, Particle-Mesh and Ewald Methods for Calculating Electrostatic Interactions in Periodic Molecular Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08927029408022004
The paper
Luty, B. A., Davis, M. E., Tironi, I. G., & Van Gunsteren, W. F. (1994). A Comparison of Particle-Particle, Particle-Mesh and Ewald Methods for Calculating Electrostatic Interactions in Periodic Molecular Systems. Molecular Simulation. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927029408022004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.