Cited by 76Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Animal-assisted Social Skills Training for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Becker, Joanna L., Rogers, Erica C., Burrows, Bethany·2017·Anthrozoös

Abstract

Recent research indicates that youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) show increases in prosocial behaviors in the presence of animals, yet few studies have examined the effects of incorporating animals into treatments. The current study evaluated the effectiveness of an animal-assisted social skills training group for youth with ASD. It was hypothesized that incorporating dogs into social skills training (SST) would produce a greater effect on improving social skills, theory of mind, and feelings of inclusion than would be obtained from SST without an animal present. We compared social skills groups with therapy dogs to traditional social skills groups without an animal present. Students with ASD attending school at a therapeutic treatment facility (n = 31; ages 8–14) were assigned to either experimental or control groups, which were both provided with 12 weeks of weekly treatment. Following participation in SST, participants in the groups with dogs were rated as significantly less symptomatic than participants in the traditional social skills group on the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2), a teacher-rated measure of autism-related symptoms. Based on self-report ratings using the Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI-2), participants in the groups with dogs experienced significantly greater reductions in symptoms measured by the Interpersonal Problems and Functional Problems subscales, and not on the other subscales of the CDI-2. Both groups showed improvement in theory of mind and decreased feelings of isolation and overall depressive symptoms; however, the effect of group on change over time was not significant. On the Social Language Development Test (SLDT), no significant differences were observed. The current findings indicate animal-assisted social skills training may be more beneficial for improving social skills and reducing related affective symptoms than traditional training models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08927936.2017.1311055

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 76

Authors
Becker, J. L., Rogers, E. C., & Burrows, B.
Affiliations
  • The Sam and Myra Ross Institute at Green Chimneys, New York, USA
  • William Paterson University (US)
Corresponding author
Becker, Joanna L.
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2017-04-03
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
307-326
ISSN
  • 0892-7936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-0377
OpenAlex
W2615716041
Cited by
76
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Anthrozoös (publishedVersion)
Funders
Human-Animal Bond Research Institute (Grant ID#D14HA-003)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
animal-assisted therapy, therapy dogs, social skills training, autism spectrum disorder, children, prosocial behavior, theory of mind, depressive symptoms, social isolation, Social Responsiveness Scale, Children's Depression Inventory, group therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review