The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Negotiated Bonds: The Practice of Childfree Pet Parenting
Abstract
The American Pet Products Association reports a decade-long increase of pet spending, estimated to reach over $69 billion in 2017. In some cases, these owners apply traditional parenting practices while nurturing their pets. Relatedly, a growing number of pet owners identify themselves as “pet parents.” This study is the first known work to investigate how identity plays a role in the growing population of pet parents. While previous research into the pet parenting phenomenon has sought to quantify the demographics, spending, and frequency of this population, less work seeks to understand what pet parenting looks like in practice. Sampling a population of childfree pet parents, the current study utilized semi-structured interviews and identified two common themes in their daily practice of the identity: 1) Despite the use of parent–child terms and strategies, childfree pet parents are acutely aware of the differences between raising children and raising pets, and 2) pet parents ascribe agency to their pet, identifying individual pet wants and needs to fulfill. This may further inform future research on human–animal relationships by establishing a human identity that connects directly to pet practices in the United States, asking us to consider the lived experiences of this growing population and their pets including spending, lifestyle, and attachment concerns.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, many people view their pets as children [84,85,86,87] and think of themselves as ‘pet parents’.”
From Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden. (2022) · cites this paper as [86]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1126/science.aaf3777 · DOI
- 10.1111/soc4.12102 · DOI
- 10.2752/175303713X13636846944402 · DOI
- Bradshaw J., 2011, Dog sense: How the new science of dog behavior can make you a better friend to your pet.
- Bradshaw J., 2017, The animals among us: How pets make us human
- 10.1080/08927936.2016.1181361 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0167750 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0163-2396(08)30011-8 · DOI
- Eriksen T., 2010, Ethnicity and nationalism: Anthropological perspectives
- Fletcher T., 2016, Social & Cultural Geography
- Gray P., 2010, Fatherhood: Evolution and human paternal behavior., 10.4159/9780674056435 · DOI
- 10.1080/08927936.2015.1064216 · DOI
- 10.2752/175303711X12923300467285 · DOI
- 10.1163/1568530041446544 · DOI
- Hare B., 2013, The genius of dogs: How dogs are smarter than you think.
- 10.1007/s10071-017-1078-6 · DOI
- 10.3122/jabfm.2015.04.140254 · DOI
- Hrdy S., 2009, Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding.
- Kotkin J., 2016, The human city: Urbanism for the rest of us.
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0170730 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2006.00484.x · DOI
- 10.1080/14649360802217790 · DOI
- 10.1525/si.2006.29.3.373 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01582 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396690.013.0017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01443.x · DOI
- Steiner E., 2013, Human–Animal Interaction Bulletin, 1, 38
- 10.2307/2695870 · DOI · Paper page
- Tucker A., 2016, The lion in the living room: How house cats tamed us and took over the world.
- Volsche S., 2016, Human–Animal Interaction Bulletin, 4, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden.
Kogan, L. R., Bussolari, C., Currin-McCulloch, J., Packman, W., & Erdman, P. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12131690 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Volsche, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Volsche, Shelly
- ORCID
- Volsche, Shelly
- Venue
- Anthrozoös
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-05-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-377
- ISSN
- 0892-7936 (ISSN-L)
- 1753-0377
- OpenAlex
- W2802198685
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anthrozoös (publishedVersion)
- Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- N/A
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographies of human-animal interactions
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- human-pet relationship, human-animal relations, pet attachment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review