The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying Cultural Service Values of a Small River in the Agricultural Landscape of Canterbury, New Zealand, Using Combined Methods
Abstract
Intensification of agricultural production involving groundwater irrigation is increasingly significant in many countries but can have negative impacts upon the ecosystem cultural services of rural streams and rivers. These are difficult to value, particularly in contested situations. Using a case study in Canterbury, New Zealand, a combination of Q method and a choice experiment is presented as a robust and transparent way to identify important cultural services of streams and rivers, and to assess their relative values. Empirical insights are offered, methodological issues discussed, and management implications identified.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, alien species can reduce the values society places on specific ecosystems and landscapes (van Wilgen, Cowling, & Burgers, 1996; Kerr & Swaffield, 2012; Ghermandi et al., 2015).”
From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Kerr & Swaffield, 2012
Citations
Cites
Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610356 · Cited by 1,823
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Boffa M., 2009, Riverscape and flow assessment: Guidelines for the selection of methods to determine river flows based on landscape, natural character and visual amenity considerations
- Brown S. R., 1980, Political subjectivity: Applications of Q method in political science
- 10.1080/08941920590881853 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.02.006 · DOI
- 10.1080/08941920309173 · DOI
- Denzin N., 1978, The research act,
- Fairweather J., 2001, Operant Subjectivity, 25, 37, 10.22488/okstate.01.100589 · DOI
- Fairweather J., 2000, Social discourses and environmental policy: Application of Q methodology, 138, 10.4337/9781781956571.00014 · DOI
- Gobster P., 1999, Landscape J., 18, 54, 10.3368/lj.18.1.54 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0969-6997(01)00031-X · DOI
- 10.1080/14486563.2007.10648705 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.06.004 · DOI
- 10.2307/1924536 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511753831 · DOI
- Marchand , N. 2006 .Riparian management: An exploration into connecting the biophysical and social sciences.PhD thesis, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.
- McKeown B., 1988, Q methodology, 10.4135/9781412985512 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00267-002-2805-5 · DOI
- Memon P., 2004, Stakeholders, the environment and society, 23
- Assessment Millenium Ecosystem, 2005, Our human planet: Summary for decisionmakers
- Environment Ministry for the, 2004, Water programme of action: The effects of rural land use on water quality
- Nassauer J., 1995, Landscape J., 14, 161, 10.3368/lj.14.2.161 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1745-7939.2002.tb01632.x · DOI
- 2007, Environmental report: New Zealand
- Painter B., 2008, Adaptive and integrated water management: Coping with complexity and uncertainty, 227, 10.1007/978-3-540-75941-6_12 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.12.004 · DOI
- Silverman D., 2005, Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook,
- 10.1080/08941920290069272 · DOI
- 10.1080/089419299279623 · DOI
- Tipa G., 2003, A cultural health index for streams and waterways: Indicators for recognizing and expressing Maori values
- Ward J., 1997, Environmental indicators for the sustainable management of freshwater
- 10.1191/1478088705qp022oa · DOI
- Young R., 2005, Determining the economic value of water: Concepts and methods
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scientists' warning on invasive alien species
Pyšek, P., Hulme, P. E., Simberloff, D., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T. M., Carlton, J. T., Dawson, W., Essl, F., Foxcroft, L. C., Genovesi, P., et al. (2020) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12627 · Cited by 2,234
Metadata
- Authors
- Kerr, G. N., & Swaffield, S. R.
- Affiliations
- Lincoln University (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Kerr, Geoffrey N.
- Venue
- Society & Natural Resources
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-06-15
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1330-1339
- ISSN
- 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0723
- OpenAlex
- W2120452751
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Society & Natural Resources (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Q Methodology Applications
- Keywords
- cultural ecosystem services, agricultural intensification, groundwater irrigation, rural streams, Q methodology, discrete choice experiment, combined approach, Canterbury, New Zealand
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying Cultural Service Values of a Small River in the Agricultural Landscape of Canterbury, New Zealand, Using Combined Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08941920.2012.676723
- The paper
- Kerr, G. N., & Swaffield, S. R. (2012). Identifying Cultural Service Values of a Small River in the Agricultural Landscape of Canterbury, New Zealand, Using Combined Methods. Society & Natural Resources. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.676723
