The impact of herder sedentarization on natural resource access in Northeastern Ghana
Abstract
The Fulani of West Africa have increasingly migrated to humid West Africa since the Sahelian droughts of the 1970s, drawing opposition from indigenous groups that are concerned about the deprivation of their livelihood and monopolization of resources for herders’ livestock. This research, which involved farmers, shepherds, and Fulani herders, addressed three issues: the nature of indigenous grazing and watering regimes, shepherd–herder relations, and herders’ impact on resource access for indigenes’ livestock. The research indicates that in-community and off-community platforms for resource access exist. The former has not been impacted by the herders; the latter has experienced changes insufficient to constitute an overhaul of resource access at the expense of indigenes’ livestock. Instead, a “shepherd–herder” category of resource access has emerged that is characterized by negotiation for resource space, opening avenues for addressing broader resource access issues, and typically tense indigene–herder relationships.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Ghana, informal partnerships with one another for mutual benefit generally promoted peaceful coexistence among farmers and herders.
“Similarly in Ghana, informal partnerships with one another for mutual benefit generally promoted peaceful coexistence among farmers and herders (Yembilah and Grant 2014a).”
From Farmer–herder conflicts in sub-Saharan Africa: drivers, impacts, and resolution and peacebuilding strategies (2023) · cites this paper as Yembilah and Grant 2014a
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adams, E. A., Thill, A., Kuusaana, E. D., & Mittag, A. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad0702 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yembilah, R., & Grant, M.
- Affiliations
- Mount Royal University (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Yembilah, Rita
- Venue
- Society & Natural Resources
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-03-28
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 621-635
- ISSN
- 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0723
- OpenAlex
- W1994408849
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Society & Natural Resources (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Thanks to the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Ottawa, for a generous grant that enabled this research.
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Rural Development Research
- Keywords
- Fulani herders, sedentarization, access to natural resources, livestock grazing, water access, resource conflicts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review