The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement
Abstract
In this article, we look at the evolving collaborative natural resource management movement in the United States and discuss current calls to evaluate it. We then explore approaches researchers have used to evaluate both specific efforts and the broader movement. Evaluative criteria developed thus far by several researchers show commonalities as well as differences. We argue that evaluation approaches will necessarily vary with the evaluation's intent, the type of collaborative effort being evaluated, and the values of the evaluator. Evaluators need to consider and make explicit their standards for comparison, criteria, and methods in order to clarify the nature of an evaluation and facilitate the synthesis of findings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Because such actions often take place over a long period of time and often by individual partners or external agents subject to other forces outside the CGR, it can be difficult to trace and attribute influence or causation to the CGR (Conley and Moote 2003;Emerson et al. 2003;Koontz and Thomas 2006).”
From An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance (2012) · cites this paper as Conley and Moote 2003
Citations
Cites
Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources
Elinor Ostrom, B., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.9739 · Cited by 3,869
Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems
Kramer, R., & Gray, B. (1990) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258026 · Cited by 2,683
Whose Reality Counts?: Putting the First Last
Chambers, R. (1997) · Cited by 2,379
Utilization-Focused Evaluation
(2018) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781506326139.n729 · Cited by 2,315
Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource management
Roush, D. (2002) · Electronic Green Journal · doi:10.5070/g311610473 · Cited by 1,438
Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems
Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944369908976071 · Cited by 1,306
Community Natural Resource Management: Promise, Rhetoric, and Reality
Kellert, J. N. M. S. R. (2000) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/089419200750035575 · Cited by 758
The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement
Susskind, L. E., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452231389 · Cited by 730
Representing communities: Histories and politics of community‐based natural resource management
Brosius, J. P., Tsing, A., & Zerner, C. (1998) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941929809381069 · Cited by 578
Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal
Innes, J. E. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781351179522-13 · Cited by 571
Making Watershed Partnerships Work: A Review of the Empirical Literature
Leach, W. D., & Pelkey, N. W. (2001) · Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2001)127:6(378 · Cited by 456
Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management
Selin, S., & Chevez, D. (1995) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/bf02471990 · Cited by 417
Spellerberg, I. F. (1993) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(93)90392-e · Cited by 391
Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management
Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (1996) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/0195-9255(96)00003-0 · Cited by 378
Resolving environmental disputes: A decade of experience
Bingham, G. (1987) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/0195-9255(87)90014-x · Cited by 369
Assessing Consensus: The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking
Coglianese, C. (1997) · Duke Law Journal · doi:10.2307/1372989 · Cited by 354
Monitoring for Conservation and Ecology
(1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-3086-8 · Cited by 291
The Case Study Method as a Tool for Doing Evaluation
Yin, R. K. (1992) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/001139292040001009 · Cited by 272
Political and ecological communication
Dryzek, J. S. (1995) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644019508414226 · Cited by 227
The theory-driven approach to validity
Chen, H.-T., & Rossi, P. H. (1987) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(87)90025-5 · Cited by 198
A New Vanguard for the Environment: Grass-Roots Ecosystem Management as a New Environmental Movement
Weber, E. P. (2000) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/089419200279081 · Cited by 198
Across the Great Divide : explorations in collaborative conservation and the American West
Brick, P., Snow, D. M., de Wetering, S. B. V., & Kemmis, D. (2001) · Island Press/Center for Resource Economics eBooks · Cited by 181
PROFILE: Integrated Environmental Management: The Foundations for Successful Practice
Margerum, R. D. (1999) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s002679900223 · Cited by 179
Integrated environmental management: strengthening the conceptualization
Born, S. M., & Sonzogni, W. C. (1995) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/bf02471988 · Cited by 176
RESEARCH: Theory in Practice: Applying Participatory Democracy Theory to Public Land Planning
Moote, M. A., McClaran, M. P., & Chickering, D. K. (1997) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s002679900074 · Cited by 175
Self-citationHalvorsen, K. E. (2001) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/089419201300000526 · Cited by 150
Ecosystem management in the United States: an assessment of current experience
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3295 · Cited by 146
Modeling Stakeholder Perceptions of Collaborative Initiative Effectiveness
Selin, M. A. S. S. W. (2000) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/089419200750035593 · Cited by 114
Managing Public Forests: Understanding the Role of Collaborative Planning
Carr, D., Selin, S., & Schuett, M. A. (1998) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s002679900146 · Cited by 112
Policy Review Evaluating Integrated Resource Management
Bellamy, G. T. J. A. (1999) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/089419299279632 · Cited by 109
Kenney, D. S. (2000) · Colorado Law Scholarly Commons (University of Colorado Colorado Springs) · Cited by 107
Community Participation in Ecosystem Management
Duane, T. P. (1997) · bepress Legal Repository · doi:10.15779/z384z6h · Cited by 104
Knowledge shared : participatory evaluation in development cooperation
Jackson, E., & Kassam, Y. (1998) · Cited by 99
The Ecology of Hope: Communities Collaborate for Sustainability
Bernard, T. B., Young, J. M., & Jackson, W. (1996) · Cited by 83
Innes, J. E. (1999) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452231389.n18 · Cited by 82
Evaluation in Practice: A Methodological Approach
Bingham, R. D., & Felbinger, C. L. (2002) · Cited by 70
Brendler, T., & Carey, H. H. (1998) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jof/96.3.21 · Cited by 69
A Classification of Collaborative Management Methods
Blumenthal, D. M., & Jannink, J. (2000) · Conservation Ecology · doi:10.5751/es-00226-040213 · Cited by 66
Placing environmental mediation in context: Lessons from “failed” mediations
Buckle, L. G., & Thomas-Buckle, S. R. (1986) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/0195-9255(86)90040-5 · Cited by 66
Regulating Federal Natural Resources: A Summary Case against Devolved Collaboration
Coggins, G. C. (1999) · bepress Legal Repository · doi:10.15779/z38d83f · Cited by 52
Local Communities and the Management of Public Forests
McClosky, M. (1999) · bepress Legal Repository · doi:10.15779/z384r7n · Cited by 43
Collaborative Management of Public Rangeland in Wyoming: Lessons in Co-Management
Paulson, D. D. (1998) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00122 · Cited by 42
Collaboration: A Guide for Environmental Advocates
Dukes, Franklin, E., Firehock, & Karen, K. (2001) · Cited by 41
An Empirical Analysis of Environmental Mediation
Sipe, N. (1998) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944369808975985 · Cited by 40
Public participation and appeals of forest service plans—An empirical examination
Gericke, K. L., & Sullivan, J. (1994) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941929409380851 · Cited by 35
Going into Partnership to Manage a Landscape
Williams, E. M., & Ellefson, P. V. (1997) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jof/95.5.29 · Cited by 34
New ideas, old institutions : environment, community, and state in the Pacific Northwest
Moseley, C. (2006) · University Microfilms International eBooks · Cited by 22
Kenney, D. S., & Lord, W. B. (1999) · Colorado Law Scholarly Commons (University of Colorado Colorado Springs) · Cited by 16
How to do coordinated resource management planning
Anderson, E. W., & Baum, R. C. (1988) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.1080/00224561.1988.12456200 · Cited by 13
Environmental Governance in Watersheds: The Role of Collaboration
Imperial, M. T., & Hennessey, T. M. (2000) · Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) · Cited by 10
The Grande Ronde Model Watershed Program: A Case Study
Mazaika, R. (1999) · Administrative Theory & Praxis · doi:10.1080/10841806.1999.11643350 · Cited by 7
The Catron County Citizens Group: A Case Study in Community Collaboration
Smith, M. (1999) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452231389.n32 · Cited by 7
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011 · Cited by 3,637
Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning
Armitage, D. R., Marschke, M. J., & Plummer, R. (2007) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002 · Cited by 1,071
Elinor Ostrom, B., Janssen, M. A., & Anderies, J. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701886104 · Cited by 918
What Do We Know and Need to Know about the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management?
Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x · Cited by 696
Metadata
- Authors
- CONLEY, A., & MOOTE, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Northern Arizona University (US)
- Venue
- Society & Natural Resources
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 371-386
- ISSN
- 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0723
- OpenAlex
- W2157693829
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 13.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Society & Natural Resources (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- collaborative natural resource management, evaluation approaches, evaluation criteria, evaluation standards, collaborative governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
