Cited by 205Fire effects on ecosystemsDisaster Management and ResilienceRangeland and Wildlife Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Demographic trends, the wildland-urban interface, and wildfire management

Hammer, Roger B., Stewart, Susan I., Radeloff, Volker C.·2009·Society & Natural Resources

Abstract

In this article, we provide an overview of the demographic trends that have impacted and will continue to impact the “wicked” wildfire management problem in the United States, with particular attention to the emergence of the wildland–urban interface (WUI). Although population growth has had an impact on the emergence of the WUI, the deconcentration of population and housing, amenity-driven population growth in select nonmetropolitan counties, and interregional population shifts to the West and Southeast have had and will continue to have much greater impacts. In the coming decades, we can expect the retirement of the baby boom generation to exacerbate these trends.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08941920802714042

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Allen G. M., 1986, J. For., 84, 20
  2. 2008, CAL FIRE 2007 wildland fire summary
  3. Carroll M. S., 2007, J. For., 105, 239
  4. McGranahan D. A., 1999, Natural amenities drive population change
  5. 2008, National 2007 on fires and acres burned by state
  6. Stewart S. I., 2007, J. For., 105, 201
  7. Teie W. C., 2000, Fire in the West: The wildland/urban interface fire problem. Report to the Council of Western State Foresters
  8. 1992, 1990 Census of population and housing: Population and housing unit counts, United States, CPH-2-1
  9. 1992, 1990 Census of population and housing: Population and housing unit counts, United States, Summary tape file 1
  10. 2000, TIGER/Line files
  11. 2002, 2000 Census of population and housing: Summary file 3
  12. 2002, 2000 Census of population and housing: Summary file 1 [machine-readable data files]
  13. 2005, Interim projections consistent with Census 2000
  14. 2001, Fed. Reg., 66, 751
  15. 1995, Federal wildland fire management policy and program review
  16. 2006, Automated lands project: National forest boundaries

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 205

Metadata

Authors
Hammer, R. B., Stewart, S. I., & Radeloff, V. C.
Affiliations
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Hammer, Roger B.
Venue
Society & Natural Resources
Published
2009-08-11
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
777-782
ISSN
  • 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0723
OpenAlex
W1966363929
Cited by
205
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Society & Natural Resources (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
demographic trends, wildland-urban interface, wildfire management, population growth, nonmetropolitan counties, baby boomer retirement, wildfire risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review