Cited by 119

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mapping nature: Territorialization of forest rights in Thailand

Vandergeest, Peter·1996·Society & Natural Resources

Abstract

In Thailand, as elsewhere, the administrative definition of forest has changed from one based on classification by species to one based on territory. This process was an important facet of the more general process by which the central government claimed a monopoly on the administration of property rights to natural resources. The process took place in three stages: First, the government declared that all territory not claimed by permanent cultivators or other government agencies was forest under the jurisdiction of the Royal Forestry Department. Second, it demarcated the forests into reserve and protected forests. Third, it mapped all forest land as well as nonforest land according to land use classifications, which became the basis for policies to control occupation and use. These strategies did not allow for local input into land use planning. As a result of this lack of state capacity, and interbureaucratic competition, the Thai government failed to control rural land use.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08941929609380962

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.2307/3673669 · DOI
  2. Ananya U., 1991, Study of conservation forest area: Demarcation protection and occupancy in Thailand, Vol. 3 (Occupancy study), 17
  3. Apichat P., 1992, A study of impact and proposed solutions for the Settlement of the Deteriorated Forest for the Poorest in the North‐East (SDF‐PIN) project
  4. Banijbatana D., 1962, The management of forests in Thailand
  5. Bryant R. L., 1993, Contesting the resource: The politics of forest management in colonial Burma
  6. Bunnag T., 1977, The provincial administration of Siam 1892–1915
  7. Chalermrath K., 1971, Thailand's public law and policy for conservation and protection of land: With special attention to forests and natural areas
  8. Chusak W., 1994, Local institutions in common property resource
  9. Dickson A. J. C., 1908, Twentieth century impressions of Siam, 170
  10. Dupuis M., 1995, Creating the countryside
  11. Eudey A., 1989, Hilltribes today, 249
  12. Feeny D., 1988, World deforestation in the twentieth century, 112
  13. The Gujarat forest manual, i
  14. 1881, The Burma forest manual
  15. 1939, Prachum Kotmai Prachamsok (Laws and statutes)
  16. 1941, Forest Act B. E. 2484
  17. 1958, Prawat lae ponngaan kong Krom Paamai (History and work of the Forestry Department)
  18. 1957, Royal Forestry Department annual report
  19. 10.2307/3984890 · DOI
  20. Hafner J. A., 1990, Keepers of the forest: Land management alternatives in Southeast Asia, 69
  21. Hirsch P., 1990, Development dilemmas in rural Thailand
  22. Hirsch P., 1993, Political economy of environment in Thailand
  23. Lohmann L., 1991, Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 23, 3, 10.1080/14672715.1991.10413139 · DOI
  24. Lysa H., 1984, Thailand in the nineteenth century: Evolution of the economy and society
  25. Mehl C., Study on the role of land in Thai society
  26. Mekvichai B., 1988, The teak industry in North Thailand
  27. Niphon T., Thai forestry sector master plan, subsector: Watershed management
  28. Peluso N. L., 1993, Global Environmental Change
  29. Pragtong K., 1990, Keepers of the forest: Land management alternatives in Southeast Asia, 167
  30. Prayong N., 1991, Study of conservation forest area: Demarcation, protection and occupancy in Thailand, Vol. 3 (occupancy study), 73
  31. Riggs F. W., 1966, Thailand: The modernization of a bureaucratic polity, 10.1515/9780824885458 · DOI
  32. Sack R. D., 1986, Human territoriality: Its theory and history
  33. Santisuk T., 1985, Nature conservation in Thailand in relation to social and economic development
  34. Shalardchai R., 1989, Culture and environment in Thailand, 23
  35. Soja E. W., 1971, The political organization of space
  36. Thirawat S., 1955, Brief information on forestry information in Thailand
  37. Tan‐Kim‐Yong U., 1993, Regional Development Dialogue, 14, 70
  38. Thongchai W., 1988, Siam mapped: A history of the geobody of Siam
  39. Tongroj O., 1990, A land policy study
  40. Weera A., 1993, Legal frameworks for forest management in Asia, 97
  41. Yos S., 1993, Legal frameworks for forest management in Asia, 105

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vandergeest, P.
Venue
Society & Natural Resources
Published
1996-03
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
159-175
ISSN
  • 0894-1920
  • 1521-0723
Cited by
119
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review