Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Animal Hoarding: Slipping Into the Darkness of Comorbid Animal and Self-Neglect

Nathanson, Jane N.·2009·Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Substantial research and literature indicate how people and companion animals form relationships that are, for the most part, mutually beneficial. Yet there are highly dysfunctional human-animal relationships that do occur, meriting attention and remediation. One of the most perplexing and problematic human-animal relationships is encountered in cases of animal hoarding--a deviant behavior associated with extremely deleterious conditions of comorbid animal and self-neglect. Adult Protective Services workers often encounter theoretical and methodological dilemmas with these complex cases. To intervene most effectively, it becomes critical to elucidate some of the developmental factors of animal hoarding behavior and its correlation with self-neglecting behaviors in general. This article presents an in-depth diagnostic perspective as derived from the author's research and clinical experience. An analysis of the complex dynamics of the relationship between animal hoarders and their pets is presented in conjunction with accepted theories of self-neglect. With enhanced knowledge and understanding of animal hoarding, human service professionals will be better prepared to respond to these clients, evoke greater rapport and cooperation, and engage in the interdisciplinary efforts that are essential for optimal resolution.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08946560903004839

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. American Animal Hospital Association, 2004, National survey of people and pet relationships
  2. Beck A., 1983, Between pets & people: The importance of animal companionship
  3. 10.1163/156853096X00115 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Berry C., 2005, Animal Law, 11, 167
  5. 10.1300/J084V12.n03-07 · DOI
  6. 10.1300/J084v12n01_06 · DOI
  7. Brown S., 2001, Society and Animals, Journal of Human-Animal Studies, 9, 25
  8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(75)91280-5 · DOI
  9. Collis G. M., 1998, Companion animals in human health
  10. Duke J., 1991, Findings of five elder abuse studies, 23
  11. Fabian D. R., 1992, Self-neglecting elders: A clinical dilemma, 3
  12. Fine A. H., 2000, Handbook on animal-assisted therapy: Theoretical foundations and guidelines for practice
  13. Frost R., 2000, Psychiatric Times, 17, 25
  14. Hoarding of Animals Research Consortium (HARC), 2002, Health & Social Work, 27, 126, 10.1093/hsw/27.2.125 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/09638239718879 · DOI
  16. Kuyper J. A., 1973, Human Development, 16, 182
  17. Lockwood R., 1994, Trends Magazine, 9, 18
  18. Lockwood R., 1998, Cruelty to animals and interpersonal violence: Readings in research and application
  19. MacMillan D., 1966, British Medical Journal, 2, 227, 10.1136/bmj.2.5521.1032 · DOI
  20. O'Brien J. G., 1999, Self-neglect: Challenges for helping professional, 1
  21. 10.1093/phr/114.1.81 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Rathbone-McCuan E., 1996, Aging Magazine, 367, 44
  23. 10.1192/bjp.133.6.550 · DOI
  24. Serpell J. A., 1986, In the company of animals

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nathanson, J. N.
Affiliations
a Private Practice , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Venue
Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
Published
2009-10-09
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
307-324
ISSN
  • 0894-6566
  • 1540-4129
Cited by
50
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review