The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
No, thank you: reasons for withdrawal from older adult abuse support services
Open accessAbstract
This study explored the prevalence, reasons, and predictors of service withdrawal by victims in a sample of 151 older adult abuse cases reported to a specialist social work service. Withdrawal occurred in 34% of cases, after an average of 3 months of contact. The most common reasons for withdrawal were victim denial of abuse and unwillingness to engage with the intervention plan. Denial and self-neglect significantly predicted withdrawal, but only denial remained predictive when both variables were entered into the regression model. Results emphasize the need to screen for and address withdrawal risk, with providers targeting denial of abuse specifically.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.2307/2137284 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3349613 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1300/J083v48n01_16 · DOI
- 10.1093/geronb/gby122 · DOI
- 10.1177/0733464814563609 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.08.004 · DOI
- 10.1177/1524838019860616 · DOI
- 10.1080/15433710903256906 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10896-023-00563-1 · DOI
- 10.2147/CIA.S311773 · DOI
- 10.1080/08946566.2013.792104 · DOI
- Storey, J. E., Hart, S. D., & Kropp, P. R. (2021). The harm to older persons evaluation (HOPE): User manual. Countering and Ending Abuse via Structured Evaluation (CEASE International).
- 10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30006-2 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Storey, J. E., Fraga Dominguez, S., & Perka, M. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Kent (GB)
- Forensic Psychology, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
- Catholic Social Services (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Storey, Jennifer E.
- Venue
- Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-11-15
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-81
- ISSN
- 0894-6566 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4129
- OpenAlex
- W4404416503
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- BCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Royal Holloway, University of London
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Keywords
- service withdrawal, self-neglect, intervention engagement, elder abuse victims
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Denial, Psychological, Elder Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Social Work
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: No, thank you: reasons for withdrawal from older adult abuse support services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08946566.2024.2428954
- The paper
- Storey, J. E., Fraga Dominguez, S., & Perka, M. R. (2025). No, thank you: reasons for withdrawal from older adult abuse support services. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect. https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2024.2428954
