Cited by 0Elder Abuse and NeglectChild Abuse and TraumaChild Abuse and Related Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Elder abuse: a scoping review of the hospital social work role

Open access
Blance-Palmer, Rachel, Klaic, Marlena, Rushford, Helen, Celeste, Tania, Joubert, Lynette·2026·Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Elder abuse is predicted to rise, and hospital social workers receive professional training to respond. A scoping review was conducted to map the breadth and extent of existing literature on hospital social worker roles in response to elder abuse. Key words searched across six databases and five journals were "social work*," "hospital*," "elder*," "abus*" and their derivatives to identify relevant literature. Included literature was peer reviewed and published since 2000. A manual citation search was also undertaken. Thematic analysis and descriptive reporting followed. A total of 32 publications were included. These were predominantly from the United States, focused on the Emergency Department setting, and were not social work-specific research. Identified themes were 1) social workers as key members in the multidisciplinary team, 2) screening for abuse and responding in the Emergency Department 3) psychosocial assessments are important, and 4) service linkages are a key role of the social worker.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08946566.2025.2554115

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1080/1364557032000119616 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1300/J010v44n04_02 · DOI
  3. 10.1300/J084v13n03_01 · DOI
  4. Brandl, B., Dyer, C. B., Heisler, C. J., Otto, J. M., Stiegel, L. A., & Thomas, R. W. (2007). Elder abuse detection and intervention: A collaborative approach. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/unimelb/detail.action?docID=423220
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=mToqEAAAQBAJ
  6. 10.1080/08946566.2022.2098218 · DOI
  7. Cham, G. W., & Seow, E. (2000). The pattern of elderly abuse presenting to an emergency department. Singapore Medical Journal, 41(12), 571–574.
  8. 10.4017/gt.2021.20.2.33-476.11 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/0312407X.2020.1778050 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.02.008 · DOI
  11. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.238 · DOI
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0140760 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/08946566.2023.2255742 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/hsw/hlz040 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/08946566.2024.2384400 · DOI
  16. Fox, G., Cracknell, A., & Belfield, P. (2007). Elder abuse: A practical guide and literature review. CME Journal Geriatric Medicine, 9 (3) , 99–104.
  17. 10.1093/geront/43.5.745 · DOI
  18. 10.1300/J084v14n01_03 · DOI
  19. 10.1067/men.2000.110621 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/gerona/60.8.1002 · DOI
  21. Gavrilovici, O., Alexa, I. D., Dronic, A., Sandu, I. A., Pancu, A., & Pîslaru, A. I. (2016). Complementary multidisciplinary elder abuse service in a geriatric clinic. Revista Medico-Chirurgicala a Societatii de Medici si Naturalisti din Iasi, 120(4), 807–811.
  22. 10.18502/ehj.v6i2.5022 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.colegn.2021.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., & Vedel, I. Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of copyright (#1148552). Canadian Intellectual Property Office.
  25. 10.1111/1742-6723.12756 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/0312407X.2022.2028874 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/00981380902922367 · DOI
  28. Kahan, F. S., & Paris, B. B. (2003). Why elder abuse continues to elude the health care system. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, New York, 70(1), 62–68.
  29. 10.1097/TGR.0b013e3181bdd661 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.regg.2017.02.003 · DOI
  31. 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1111/acem.14646 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/gerona/glab354 · DOI
  34. 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000060 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.12.011 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2019.11.003 · DOI
  37. Moola, S., Munn, Z., Tufanaru, C., Aromataris, E., Sears, K., Sfetcu, R., Currie, M., Qureshi, R., Mattis, P., Lisy, K., & Chapter, M. P.-F. (2020). Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), Jbi manual for evidence synthesis JBI. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
  38. 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00099 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Munn, Z., Moola, S., Lisy, K., Riitano, D., & Tufanaru, C. (2020b). Chapter 5: Systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), Jbi manual for evidence synthesis JBI.
  40. 10.56687/9781447342489 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/19371918.2022.2104415 · DOI
  42. Phua, D. H., Ng, T. W., & Seow, E. (2008). Epidemiology of suspected elderly mistreatment in Singapore. Singapore Medical Journal, 49(10), 765–773.
  43. 10.1080/08946566.2018.1460285 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.07.005 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/08946566.2013.784070 · DOI
  46. 10.1093/bjsw/bcab264 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/jgs.17967 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.01.037 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.08.010 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.cger.2018.04.007 · DOI
  51. 10.1136/emermed-2017-207303 · DOI
  52. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55853 · DOI
  53. 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0150pt · DOI
  54. 10.1300/J084v14n01_05 · DOI
  55. 10.1186/s12877-022-03682-4 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30006-2 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Blance-Palmer, R., Klaic, M., Rushford, H., Celeste, T., & Joubert, L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Melbourne
Corresponding author
Blance-Palmer, Rachel
Venue
Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
Published
2025-09-10
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
99-121
ISSN
  • 0894-6566 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4129
OpenAlex
W4414112336
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
Keywords
elder abuse, hospital social work, social worker role, emergency department, abuse screening, multidisciplinary team, psychosocial assessment, service linkage
MeSH terms
Social Workers, Aged, Elder Abuse, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Social Work, Professional Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review