African American Women's Perspectives of Shared Parenting After Dissolution of a Violent Relationship
Abstract
This study examined the perspectives of women who engaged in shared parenting with an estranged partner after dissolution of a violent relationship. Focus group data from five African American women were analyzed using content analysis. Findings indicated that new types of awareness emerged over time consistent with transitions in personal narratives, roles, and systemic changes. Notable shifts in participants' perceptions of the role that violence played in their lives occurred as children matured. Implications of these shifts on the conceptualization of shared parenting interventions are examined.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
From the literature, cultural and gender role expectations, economic dependency, and children's well-being are factors that may deter racial minority women survivors of DV to leave an abusive relationship.
“From the literature, we understand that cultural and gender role expectations ( Buchbinder & Abu Tanha, 2019 ; Tubbs, 2010 ; Williams & Jenkins, 2015 ), economic dependency ( Fox et al., 2018 ; McKinley & Liddell, 2022 ; Tam et al., 2015 ), and children's well-being ( Buchbinder & Abu Tanha, 2019 ; Meyer & Stambe, 2022 ) are factors that may deter racial minority women survivors of DV to leave an”
From Challenges in Shared Parenting Among Racial Minority Women Survivors of Domestic Violence With Young Children (2025) · cites this paper as Tubbs, 2010
Racial minority women with children are reluctant to use formal systems (e.g., to report to the police or child welfare agency) to address DV issues due to colonialization and discrimination experienced by racial minority women.
“This is quite consistent with the literature that indicates racial minority women with children are reluctant to use formal systems (e.g., to report to the police or child welfare agency) to address DV issues due to colonialization and discrimination experienced by racial minority women ( Meyer & Stambe, 2022 ; Tubbs, 2010 ).”
From Challenges in Shared Parenting Among Racial Minority Women Survivors of Domestic Violence With Young Children (2025) · cites this paper as Tubbs, 2010
New forms of awareness emerged when children matured and when societal support increased.
“This is consistent with Tubbs (2010) , who noted that new forms of awareness emerged when children matured and when societal support increased.”
From Challenges in Shared Parenting Among Racial Minority Women Survivors of Domestic Violence With Young Children (2025) · cites this paper as Tubbs (2010)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Tubbs, C. Y.
- Affiliations
- Drexel University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tubbs, Carolyn Y.
- ORCID
- Tubbs, Carolyn Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Feminist Family Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-05-17
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 130-152
- ISSN
- 0895-2833 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4099
- OpenAlex
- W2094933787
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Feminist Family Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- shared parenting, intimate partner violence, African American women, post-separation parenting, women's perspectives, personal narrative, parenting support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
