Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PATHOGENICITY OF A SPECIAL-PURPOSE GLASS MICROFIBER (E GLASS) RELATIVE TO ANOTHER GLASS MICROFIBER AND AMOSITE ASBESTOS

R. T.Cullen, A. Searl, D. Buchanan,·2000·Inhalation Toxicology
DOI 10.1080/08958370050138012
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article describes the activity of an E-glass microfiber (104E) during chronic inhalation and intraperitoneal injection studies in rats. Results are compared with another microfiber of similar dissolution rate (k(dis)), code 100/475, and the more durable amosite asbestos, both of which we had previously used in similar experiments (Davis et al., 1996). Rats were exposed to aerosol concentrations of 1000 fibers (longer than 5 microm)/ml, as measured by optical microscopy, for 7 h/day, 5 days/wk. Subgroups of rats were followed for mean lung burden, early and late signs of fibrosis, and tumor incidence. At the end of 12 mo of exposure, the mean number of 104E fibers of all lengths in the lungs was approximately double that for amosite but two-thirds of that for 100/475. For fibers longer than 15 microm, the mean 104E burden was similar to that for the amosite and more than twice that of the 100/475. After a 12-mo recovery period, the retained lung burdens (of fibers of all lengths) were approximately 30% of those at 12 mo for both microfibers, and somewhat higher (approximately 44%) for amosite. Amosite and 100/475 fibers longer than 15 microm were more persistent in the lungs than 104E fibers. The chemical composition of 104E fibers did not appear to have been significantly altered by up to 24 mo of residence in lung tissue, whereas the composition of 100/475 was substantially altered over the same time period. From the inhalation study, out of the pathology subgroup of 43…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08958370050138012

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Armitage P., 1994, Occup. Hyg, 18, 187
  2. Bolton R. E., 1983, Br. J. Ind. Med, 40, 264
  3. Davis J. M. G, 1986, Scand. J. Work Environ. Health, 12, 12
  4. Davis J. M. G., 1986, Br.]. Exp. PathoL, 67, 415
  5. Johnson N. F, 1994, Toxicol. Pharmaco, 1, 57
  6. Kane A. B., 1993, Mechanisms of mesothelial cell injury, proliferation, and neoplasia induced by asbestos fibers
  7. Leineweber J. P, 1984, Solubility of fibres in vitro and in vivo, 2, pp. 87
  8. Donaldson K, 1999, Ann. Occup. Hyg, 43, 167, 10.1093/annhyg/43.3.167 · doi:10.1093/annhyg/43.3.167
  9. Miller B. G., 1999, Ann. Occup. Hyg, 43, 155, 10.1093/annhyg/43.3.155 · DOI
  10. Moalli P. A., 1987, Am.]. PathoL, 128, 426
  11. Pott F, 1993, Testing the carcinogenicity of fibers in laboratory animals: Results and conclusions

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
R. T.Cullen, A. S.
Venue
Inhalation Toxicology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2000-01
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
959-977
ISSN
  • 0895-8378
  • 1091-7691
DOI
10.1080/08958370050138012
Cited by
16
References
24
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.