The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Toxicological Response of Brazilian Chrysotile Asbestos: A Multidose Subchronic 90-Day Inhalation Toxicology Study with 92-Day Recovery to Assess Cellular and Pathological Response
Abstract
Inhalation toxicology studies with chrysotile asbestos have in the past been performed at exceedingly high doses without consideration of fiber number or dimensions. As such, the exposures have exceeded lung overload levels, making quantitative assessment of these studies difficult if not impossible. To assess the cellular and pathological response in the rat lung to a well-characterized aerosol of chrysotile asbestos, a 90-day subchronic inhalation toxicology study was performed using a commercial Brazilian chrysotile (CA 300). The protocol was based on that established by the European Commission for the evaluation of synthetic vitreous fibers. The study was also designed to assess the potential for reversibility of any such changes and to permit association of responses with fiber dose in the lung and the influence of fiber length. Wistar male rats were randomly assigned to an air control group and to 2 CA 300 exposure groups at mean fiber aerosol concentrations of 76 fibers L > 20 microm/cm3 (3413 total fibers/cm3; 536 WHO fibers/cm3) or 207 fibers L > 20 microm/cm3 (8941 total fibers/cm3; 1429 WHO fibers/cm3). The animals were exposed using a flow-past, nose-only exposure system for 5 days/wk, 6 h/day, during 13 consecutive weeks (65 exposures), followed by a subsequent nonexposure period lasting for 92 days. Animals were sacrificed after cessation of exposure and after 50 and 92 days of nonexposure recovery. At each sacrifice, subgroups of rats were assessed for the dete…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In another study, the percentage of retention of chrysotile fibers > 5 μm (WHO) and > 20 μm was slightly higher than that of fibers < 5 μm and total fibers, and the mean length increased from 3.5 μm to 4.20 μm after 90 days, in agreement with a better clearance of shorter fibers or breakage of the longest fibers [104].”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [104]
In the citing paper
“For nose-only exposure, fibers were preselected using a water-based separation process [104,120], a procedure that may alter the physico-chemical state of the fibers.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [104]
Citations
Cites
Bernstein, D., Castranova, V., Donaldson, K., Fubini, B., Hadley, J., Hesterberg, T., Kane, A., Lai, D., McConnell, E. E., Muhle, H., et al. (2005) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.1080/08958370591001121 · Cited by 103
Self-citationBernstein, D. M., Rogers, R., & Smith, P. (2005) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.1080/08958370590885663 · Cited by 67
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Agency f or, 2003, Report on the Expert Panel on Health Effects of Asbestos and Synthetic Vitreous Fibers: The influence of fiber length
- Bellmann B., 1992, Environ. Health. Perspect., 97, 189, 10.1289/ehp.9297189 · DOI
- Bellmann B., 2003, Inhal. Toxicol., 15, 1147, 10.1080/08958370390229843 · DOI
- Berman D. W., 2003, Technical support document for a protocol to assess asbestos-related risk
- Bernstein D. M., 1999, Methods for the determination of the hazardous properties for human health of man made mineral fibers (MMMF)
- 10.1289/ehp.94102s515 · DOI · Paper page
- Bernstein D. M., 2001, Inhal. Toxicol., 13, 823, 10.1080/089583701752378133 · DOI
- Bernstein D. M., 2001, Inhal. Toxicol., 13, 851, 10.1080/089583701752378142 · DOI
- Bernstein D. M., 2003, Inhal. Toxicol., 15, 1387, 10.1080/08958370390248888 · DOI
- Bernstein D. M., 2004, Inhal. Toxicol., 16, 745, 10.1080/08958370490490176 · DOI · Paper page
- Bernstein D. M., 2005, Inhal. Toxicol., 17, 427, 10.1080/08958370591002012 · DOI · Paper page
- Bolton R. E., 1983, Br. J. Ind. Med, 40, 264
- Cannon W. C., 1983, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 44, 923, 10.1080/15298668391405959 · DOI
- Christensen V. R., 1994, Environ. Health Perspect., 102, 83, 10.1289/ehp.94102s583 · DOI
- Coin P. G., 1992, Environ. Res., 58, 97, 10.1016/S0013-9351(05)80207-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Cossette M., 1979, short course in mineralogical techniques of asbestos determination, 79
- Cruxên Barros de Oliveira M., 1989, Mineralogical analysis chrysotile
- 10.1089/089426802320282338 · DOI
- Gilmour P. S., 2004, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 195, 35, 10.1016/j.taap.2003.10.003 · DOI
- Hesterberg T. W., 1993, Fundam. Appl. Toxicol., 20, 464, 10.1006/faat.1993.1057 · DOI · Paper page
- Hesterberg T. W., 1998, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 151, 262, 10.1006/taap.1998.8472 · DOI · Paper page
- Hext P. M, 1994, Hum. Exp. Toxicol., 13, 700, 10.1177/096032719401301009 · DOI
- Hodgson A. A, 1979, Asbestos: properties, applications and hazards, 67
- McConnell E. E., 2002, Inhal. Toxicol., 14, 263, 10.1080/08958370252809040 · DOI
- Morrow P. E, 1988, Fundam. Appl. Toxicol, 10, 369, 10.1016/0272-0590(88)90284-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Morrow P. E, 1992, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 113, 1, 10.1016/0041-008X(92)90002-A · DOI
- Muhle H., 1988, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 32, 141
- Muhle H., 1987, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 31, 755, 10.1093/annhyg/31.4B.755 · DOI
- Muhle H., 1988, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 32, 141, 10.1093/annhyg/32.inhaled_particles_VI.141 · DOI
- Oberdörster G, 1995, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 21, 123, 10.1006/rtph.1995.1017 · DOI · Paper page
- Oberdörster G, 1995, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 21, 233, 10.1006/rtph.1995.1034 · DOI
- Oberdörster G, 2002, Inhal. Toxicol, 14, 29, 10.1080/089583701753338622 · DOI · Paper page
- Oberdörster G., 1992, Exp. Lung. Res., 18, 87, 10.3109/01902149209020653 · DOI
- Rogers R. A., 1999, Environ. Health Perspect., 107, 367
- Stoeber W., 1970, Staub-Reinh. Luft., 30, 277
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003, Report on the Peer Consultation Workshop to discuss a proposed protocol to assess asbestos-related risk
- Warheit D. B., 1992, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 116, 225, 10.1016/0041-008X(92)90302-9 · DOI
- World Health Organization, 1985, Reference methods for measuring airborne man-made mineral fibres (MMMF), WHO/EURO MMMF Reference Scheme, 4
- Wypych F., 2005, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 283, 107, 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.139 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boulanger, G., Andujar, P., Pairon, J.-C., Billon-Galland, M.-A., Dion, C., Dumortier, P., Brochard, P., Sobaszek, A., Bartsch, P., Paris, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-13-59 · Cited by 176
Health risk of chrysotile revisited
Bernstein, D., Dunnigan, J., Hesterberg, T., Brown, R., Velasco, J. A. L., Barrera, R., Hoskins, J., & Gibbs, A. (2013) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.3109/10408444.2012.756454 · Cited by 172
Self-citationThe health risk of chrysotile asbestos
Bernstein, D. M. (2014) · Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine · doi:10.1097/mcp.0000000000000064 · Cited by 57
Self-citationMineral Fibres and Asbestos Bodies in Human Lung Tissue: A Case Study
Di Giuseppe, D., Zoboli, A., Vigliaturo, R., Gieré, R., Bonasoni, M. P., Sala, O., & Gualtieri, A. F. (2019) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min9100618 · Cited by 26
“, intratracheal, intraperitoneal) or inhalation in the animals’ lungs [17,28,29].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernstein, D. M., Rogers, R., Smith, P., & Chevalier, J.
- Venue
- Inhalation Toxicology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 313-332
- ISSN
- 0895-8378
- 1091-7691
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review