Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a Short-Term Inhalation Test in the Rat Using Nano-Titanium Dioxide as a Model Substance

Ma-Hock, Lan, Burkhardt, Silke, Strauss, Volker, Gamer, Armin O., Wiench, Karin, van Ravenzwaay, Bennard, Landsiedel, Robert·2009·Inhalation Toxicology

Abstract

Evidence suggests that short-term inhalation studies may provide comparable prediction of respiratory tract toxicity to 90-day studies, presenting the opportunity to save time and resources in screening inhalation toxicity of test substances. The aim of this study was to develop a short-term inhalation test that could be employed to provide early evidence on respiratory tract effects which might occur from long-term exposure to aerosols of nano-materials. Male Wistar rats were exposed to aerosols of 0 (control), 2, 10 and 50 mg/m(3) nano-titanium dioxide (TiO2) by inhalation for 6 h/day for 5 days. Necropsies were performed either immediately after the last exposure or after 3 and 16 days post exposure (study days 5, 8 and 21, respectively). Treatment with nano-TiO2 resulted in morphological changes in the lung, with 50 mg/m(3) nano-TiO2 producing an increase in lung weight. Lung inflammation was associated with dose-dependent increases in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) total cell and neutrophil counts, total protein content, enzyme activities and levels of a number of cell mediators. No indications of systemic effects could be found by measurement of appropriate clinical pathology parameters. Cell replication (determined by incorporation of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine) was increased at all nano-TiO2 dose levels in large/medium bronchi and terminal bronchioles. The effects on the parameters measured were most prominent either on study day 5 or 8, with some endpoints returning to control levels by day 21. Overall, the pulmonary effects of nano-TiO2 observed in this short-term study were comparable to those previously reported in subchronic inhalation studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08958370802361057

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Ma-Hock, L., Burkhardt, S., Strauss, V., Gamer, A. O., Wiench, K., van Ravenzwaay, B., & Landsiedel, R.
Venue
Inhalation Toxicology
Published
2009-02
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
102-118
ISSN
  • 0895-8378 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7691
OpenAlex
W2042791400
Cited by
197
References
2
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a Short-Term Inhalation Test in the Rat Using Nano-Titanium Dioxide as a Model Substance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08958370802361057
The paper
Ma-Hock, L., Burkhardt, S., Strauss, V., Gamer, A. O., Wiench, K., van Ravenzwaay, B., & Landsiedel, R. (2009). Development of a Short-Term Inhalation Test in the Rat Using Nano-Titanium Dioxide as a Model Substance. Inhalation Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958370802361057

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.