The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Particle Paradigms
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“At the 7th particle toxicology meeting in 1999, the ambient particulate matter (PM10/2.5) was first discussed, as at the previous meetings up to 1996, the particles discussed were exclusively silica and asbestos [310].”
From Particle toxicology and health - where are we? (2019) · cites this paper as [310]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Davies, J.M.G., and Jaurand, M.C., eds. 1994.Cellular and molecular effects of mineral and synthetic dusts and fibres. NATO ASI Series, Series H (Cell Biology), vol. 85. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. · DOI
- Mossman, B.T., and Begin, R.O., eds. 1989.Effects of mineral dusts on cells. NATO ASI series, Series H (Cell Biology), vol. 30. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. · DOI
- Oberdörster, G., and Driscoll, K.E. 1997.Particle toxicity. Toxicology of natural and man-made fibrous and non-fibrous particles. Environ. Health Perspect. 105(suppl. 5): 1001–1372. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Particle toxicology and health - where are we?
Riediker, M., Zink, D., Kreyling, W., Oberdörster, G., Elder, A., Graham, U., Lynch, I., Duschl, A., Ichihara, G., Ichihara, S., et al. (2019) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-019-0302-8 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Donaldson, K., & Borm, P.
- Venue
- Inhalation Toxicology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- sup3
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0895-8378
- 1091-7691
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Particle Paradigms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08958378.2000.11463205
- The paper
- Donaldson, K., & Borm, P. (2000). Particle Paradigms. Inhalation Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958378.2000.11463205
