Cited by 26Social and Intergroup PsychologyEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

How Far Does Stereotype Threat Reach? The Potential Detriment of Face Validity in Cognitive Ability Testing

Grand, James A., Ryan, Ann Marie, Schmitt, Neal, Hmurovic, Jillian·2010·Human Performance

Abstract

A common belief is that improvements in a test's face validity have a positive impact on the performance and perceptions of test takers. However, the stereotype threat literature suggests adding job relevant context to tests could negatively impact the performance of women if that context is traditionally male stereotyped. To test this prediction, 345 participants (n = 236 female) completed either a face valid or generic version of a mathematical and mechanical ability test under conditions of explicit or no explicit stereotype threat. Contrary to stereotype threat theory predictions, face validity had either beneficial or nonsignificant effects on test performance and test perceptions and did not affect the psychometric properties of either test. Implications and recommendations for future research regarding the study of face validity and stereotype threat are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08959285.2010.518184

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 62 · Cited by 26

Authors
Grand, J. A., Ryan, A. M., Schmitt, N., & Hmurovic, J.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Human Performance
Published
2010-12-30
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1-28
ISSN
  • 0895-9285 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7043
OpenAlex
W2078664242
Cited by
26
References
62
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Performance (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
stereotype threat, face validity, cognitive ability testing, test performance, women, gender stereotypes, mathematical ability, mechanical ability, psychometric properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review