How Far Does Stereotype Threat Reach? The Potential Detriment of Face Validity in Cognitive Ability Testing
Abstract
A common belief is that improvements in a test's face validity have a positive impact on the performance and perceptions of test takers. However, the stereotype threat literature suggests adding job relevant context to tests could negatively impact the performance of women if that context is traditionally male stereotyped. To test this prediction, 345 participants (n = 236 female) completed either a face valid or generic version of a mathematical and mechanical ability test under conditions of explicit or no explicit stereotype threat. Contrary to stereotype threat theory predictions, face validity had either beneficial or nonsignificant effects on test performance and test perceptions and did not affect the psychometric properties of either test. Implications and recommendations for future research regarding the study of face validity and stereotype threat are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is some support that face valid tests reduce group differences in performance.
“There is some support that face valid tests reduce group differences in performance (Grand et al., 2010).”
From Factors Related to Mean Score Group Differences on Cognitive Ability Tests: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Grand et al., 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 62 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Grand, J. A., Ryan, A. M., Schmitt, N., & Hmurovic, J.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Human Performance
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-12-30
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-28
- ISSN
- 0895-9285 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7043
- OpenAlex
- W2078664242
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Performance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- stereotype threat, face validity, cognitive ability testing, test performance, women, gender stereotypes, mathematical ability, mechanical ability, psychometric properties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review