Cited by 6Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Symptom discrimination and habituation: a case study of behavioral treatment for postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS)

Ralston, Timothy E., Kanzler, Kathryn E.·2016·Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a multifaceted disorder of the autonomic nervous system that profoundly impacts physical functioning. In addition to physical consequences, many patients develop situational anxiety that causes reduced activity level, which may impede functional recovery from POTS. Despite links with anxiety, to date there have been no reports of psychological intervention for POTS. Here we report a case study of POTS in a 40-year-old female serving on active duty in the US military. Because there are no established guidelines for the psychological treatment of POTS, intervention techniques were adapted for use with the patient. Elements of cognitive behavioral therapy, including in-vivo exposure and symptom discrimination, were used to target avoidance of feared situations. Over the course of treatment, the patient learned to discriminate her POTS symptoms from anxiety and displayed a significant decrease in POTS-related functional impairment. Implications for future care are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08964289.2014.977765

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific data supporting psychological therapy in POTS are lacking, but there is a 2016 case report demonstrating significant decrease in POTS-related functional impairment in a woman treated with cognitive behavioral therapy.

    “Specific data supporting psychological therapy in POTS are lacking, but there is a 2016 case report demonstrating significant decrease in POTS-related functional impairment in a woman treated with cognitive behavioral therapy (116).”

    From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [116]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ralston, T. E., & Kanzler, K. E.
Affiliations
  • United States Air Force (US)
  • Malcolm Grow Medical Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Ralston, Timothy E.
Venue
Behavioral Medicine
Published
2015-01-29
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
57-62
ISSN
  • 0896-4289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-4026
OpenAlex
W2074147116
Cited by
6
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, habituation, cognitive behavioral therapy, in vivo exposure, anxiety, autonomic dysfunction, avoidance, functional disability, military personnel, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Behavior Therapy, Blood Pressure, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review