Cited by 65Migraine and Headache StudiesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Effect of Different Meditation Types on Migraine Headache Medication Use

Open access
Wachholtz, Amy B., Malone, Christopher D., Pargament, Kenneth I.·2017·Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Spiritual meditation has been found to reduce the frequency of migraines and physiological reactivity to stress. However, little is known about how introducing a spirituality component into a meditation intervention impacts analgesic medication usage. In this study, 92 meditation-naïve participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) Spiritual Meditation, (n = 25), (2) Internally Focused Secular Meditation (n = 23), (3) Externally Focused Secular Meditation (n = 22), or (4) Progressive Muscle Relaxation (n = 22); and practiced their technique for 20 min/day over 30 days while completing daily diaries. Headache frequency, headache severity, and pain medication use were assessed. Migraine frequency decreased in the Spiritual Meditation group compared to other groups (p < 0.05). Headache severity ratings did not differ across groups (p = ns). After adjusting for headache frequency, migraine medication usage decreased in the Spiritual Meditation group compared to other groups (p < 0.05). Spiritual Meditation was found to not affect pain sensitivity, but it does improve pain tolerance with reduced headache related analgesic medication usage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08964289.2015.1024601

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MBSR can help decrease headache frequency, lessen pain intensity, and improve related symptoms such as anxiety and depression.

    “Several studies have shown that MBSR can help decrease headache frequency, lessen pain intensity, and improve related symptoms such as anxiety and depression.”

    From The effectiveness of mindfulness as a complementary therapy in headache patients: a preliminary interventional study (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

    Results > Headache Frequency reports fewer migraines in the spiritual-meditation group. But Results > Headache Severity finds no reduction in headache severity, contrary to the pain-intensity part of the claim. The study tested spiritual and secular meditation rather than MBSR, and our copy does not report improvements in anxiety or depression. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other RS constructs are, within certain limits, amenable to randomization or manipulation.

    “But others are, within certain limits, amenable to such treatments.”
  • It is possible to study the effects of spiritual meditation, prayer, or other RS behavioral variables on stress reactivity in the laboratory by including only willing participants, using random assignment with designed controls, and exposing participants to a stressor and measuring stress responses.

    “it is quite possible to study the effects of spiritual meditation, prayer, or other RS behavioral variables (e.g., scripture reading) on stress reactivity in the laboratory”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 65

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]DeMaagd G The phamacological management of migraine, part 1 P T 2008 33 7 404 416 19750119 PMC2740949

Authors
Wachholtz, A. B., Malone, C. D., & Pargament, K. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Bowling Green State University
Corresponding author
Wachholtz, Amy B.
Venue
Behavioral Medicine
Published
2015-07-25
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0896-4289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-4026
OpenAlex
W2025504027
Cited by
65
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA030397)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
meditation, migraine, spiritual meditation, progressive muscle relaxation, analgesic use, headache frequency, headache severity, pain tolerance, pain sensitivity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Analgesics, Female, Humans, Male, Migraine Disorders, Meditation, Spirituality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review