Cited by 136Mental Health Treatment and AccessPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeting Self-Stigma in Returning Military Personnel and Veterans: A Review of Intervention Strategies

Open access

Abstract

Research suggests that mental health-related stigma significantly decreases the use of mental health services by military personnel and veterans. The goal of this article is to review what is known about mental health stigma as it relates to military personnel and veterans, as well as to offer an interpretive review of self-stigma intervention strategies that have been applied within the field. Target areas for future work and the concerns and challenges faced by interventionists are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08995600903417399

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. American Psychiatric Association., 2008, Military Family Mental Health Survey
  2. Department of Defense Task Force on Mental Health., 2007, An achievable vision: Report of the Department of Defense Task Force on Mental Health
  3. Granello D. H., 2000, Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 22, 162
  4. Sayer N. A., Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes
  5. U.S. Army., 2008, Predeployment battlemind for spouse/couples
  6. United States Government Accountability Office., 2009, DODs and VAs sharing of information could benefit from improved management
  7. Vogt D. S., 2009, An integrated model of facilitators and barriers to VA health-care use: Application to OEF/OIF veterans

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–136 of 136

Metadata

Authors
Dickstein, B. D., Vogt, D. S., Handa, S., & Litz, B. T.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
Venue
Military Psychology
Published
2010-04-02
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
224-236
ISSN
  • 0899-5605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7876
OpenAlex
W2051146230
Cited by
135
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Military Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
self-stigma, mental health stigma, veterans, mental health service utilization, barriers to mental health care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review