Sleep deprivation in air National Guard medical personnel responding to simulated disaster-training exercises
Abstract
National Guard personnel remain largely unstudied within the sleep research community, despite their unique and important role. In response, the purpose of this study was to investigate the extent of sleep deprivation in National Guard medical personnel from two separate Air Force Bases (AFBs) responding to simulated disaster-training exercises. National Guard medical personnel (N = 77) were fitted with wrist activity monitors (actigraphy) to objectively measure their sleep for 4 days of their civilian time (baseline), followed by a 4-day transition period from civilian to military duty, and a 3–5-day disaster-training exercise. Differences in sleep quantity, quality, and “cognitive effectiveness” were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models. Participants’ sleep quantity was significantly reduced from civilian to disaster-training periods, and their cognitive effectiveness also dropped significantly. National Guard medical personnel were sleep-deprived during a simulated disaster-training exercise, which, although a valid proxy for real-world disasters, is likely to be a conservative approximation of the stress and fatigue National Guard personnel experience during crisis response. As such, the need for targeted fatigue-related interventions to safeguard our service members during these critical times is clear.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a simulation study with 77 Air National Guard medical personnel, sleep quantity significantly decreased from civilian to disaster-training periods, with parallel decrease in cognitive performance.
“In a simulation study with 77 medical personnel of the Air National Guard (a federal military reserve force of the United States Air Force) it turned out that participants’ sleep quantity significantly decreased from civilian to disaster-training periods, while their cognitive performance decreased in parallel (74).”
Research on sleep disturbances among military MDs is scarce and consistent data are lacking.
“Regarding sleep disturbances among military MDs, research is scarce, and consistent data are lacking.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- James, L., Smart, D., Odom-Maryon, T., Honn, K. A., & Rowan, S.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University Spokane (US)
- College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- James, Lois
- Venue
- Military Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-02-15
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 138-146
- ISSN
- 0899-5605 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7876
- OpenAlex
- W2913748114
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Military Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- TriService Nursing Research Program (HU0001-16-1-TS01 (N16-501))
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
- Keywords
- sleep deprivation, military personnel, sleep quantity, sleep quality, cognitive performance, fatigue, actigraphy, crisis response
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review