Cited by 83Agronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and Fertilization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Effect of Nitrogen Catch Crops on the Nitrogen Nutrition of a Succeeding Crop: I. Effects through Mineralization and Pre-emptive Competition

Thorup-Kristensen, Kristian·1993·Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil & Plant Science

Abstract

The effects of catch crops on the nitrogen nutrition of a succeeding carrot crop were investigated. An attempt was made to distinguish the effects of growth and nitrogen uptake by the catch crop from the effect of mineralization of its residues. It was found that growth and nitrogen uptake by catch crops could reduce the nitrogen supply to the succeeding carrot crop through pre-emptive competition, whereas mineralization of nitrogen from the catch crop residues increased the nitrogen supply to the carrot crop. Nitrogen uptake by the carrots was thus highest where catch crop residues were incorporated on plots where no catch crop had been grown. The effect of the mineralization was found mainly to influence topsoil mineral nitrogen contents and the early nitrogen uptake by carrots, whereas the effect of pre-emptive competition was to reduce subsoil mineral nitrogen content and the nitrogen uptake by carrots late in the growing season. The apparent recovery of catch crop nitrogen by carrots was between 8 and 33%.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09064719309411222

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Breland, T. A. 1989.Soil organic carbon and nitrogen dynamics in grain cropping: Effects of undersown catch crops and green manuring, Ph.D. Thesis 142Ås: Department of Microbiology, Agricultural University of Norway.
  2. Elers B., 1986, VDLUFA-Schriftenreihe, 20, 427
  3. Elers B., 1987, Gemüse, 4, 210
  4. 10.1071/SR9900973 · DOI
  5. 10.1071/SR9900963 · DOI
  6. Jäggli F., 1978, Mitteilungen für die Schweizerische Landwirtschaft, 26, 130
  7. 10.1080/00015129109439917 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1992.tb00141.x · DOI
  9. 10.1080/00015129109439907 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0038-0717(83)90064-0 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/00015129109439906 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/jpln.19891520202 · DOI
  13. S⊘egaard K., 1986, Tidskr. Planteavl, 90, 300
  14. 10.1002/jpln.19921550112 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/jpln.19931560109 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/09064719309410233 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thorup-Kristensen, K.
Venue
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil & Plant Science
Published
1993-06
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
74-81
ISSN
  • 0906-4710 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-1913
OpenAlex
W1994779931
Cited by
83
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
carrot, nitrogen mineralization, nitrogen uptake, nitrogen recovery, crop succession

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review