Testing the effectiveness of an intervention model based on data use: a replication series across clusters of schools
Abstract
Intervention models based on data use can be effective in raising student achievement. This article presents 3 studies of one such model which had reported improved reading comprehension levels in 7 poor urban multicultural schools serving indigenous and ethnic minority communities. The intervention (the Learning Schools Model) used a process comprising critical discussions of achievement and teacher observation data to develop specific and contextualized content for fine-tune instruction. The reliability and generality of the effects of the model were tested in a cluster of “like” schools and a cluster of “unlike” schools. The growth models showed similar effects to the original schools, with gains of between 3 to 4 months additional progress per year over 3 years. The replications show that models that use data to design local program content can be reliably and generally effective, but also there is a need to examine differential effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using data effectively can improve how schools function by raising student achievement.
“Although effective data use can help improve the functioning of schools in terms of increased student achievement”
From Data teams for school improvement (2016) · cites this paper as McNaughton, Lai, & Hsiao, 2012
DBDM can improve student outcomes.
“While evidence suggests that DBDM can improve student outcomes [6], more work is needed to effectively translate this into widespread practice.”
From Using Evidence-Based Practice and Data-Based Decision Making in Inclusive Education (2021) · cites this paper as [6]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 40 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- McNaughton, S., Lai, M. K., & Hsiao, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- McNaughton, Stuart
- Venue
- School Effectiveness and School Improvement
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-228
- ISSN
- 0924-3453 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-5124
- OpenAlex
- W2053194717
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 11.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- School Effectiveness and School Improvement (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- New Zealand Council for Educational Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- data-driven decision making, academic performance, reading comprehension, intervention effectiveness, replication, growth models, differential effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review