Cited by 77Educational Assessment and ImprovementTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesSchool Choice and Performance

Testing the effectiveness of an intervention model based on data use: a replication series across clusters of schools

McNaughton, Stuart, Lai, Mei Kuin, Hsiao, Selena·2012·School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Abstract

Intervention models based on data use can be effective in raising student achievement. This article presents 3 studies of one such model which had reported improved reading comprehension levels in 7 poor urban multicultural schools serving indigenous and ethnic minority communities. The intervention (the Learning Schools Model) used a process comprising critical discussions of achievement and teacher observation data to develop specific and contextualized content for fine-tune instruction. The reliability and generality of the effects of the model were tested in a cluster of “like” schools and a cluster of “unlike” schools. The growth models showed similar effects to the original schools, with gains of between 3 to 4 months additional progress per year over 3 years. The replications show that models that use data to design local program content can be reliably and generally effective, but also there is a need to examine differential effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09243453.2011.652126

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using data effectively can improve how schools function by raising student achievement.

    “Although effective data use can help improve the functioning of schools in terms of increased student achievement”

    From Data teams for school improvement (2016) · cites this paper as McNaughton, Lai, & Hsiao, 2012

  • DBDM can improve student outcomes.

    “While evidence suggests that DBDM can improve student outcomes [6], more work is needed to effectively translate this into widespread practice.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 40 · Cited by 77

Authors
McNaughton, S., Lai, M. K., & Hsiao, S.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
McNaughton, Stuart
Venue
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
Published
2012-06
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
203-228
ISSN
  • 0924-3453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5124
OpenAlex
W2053194717
Cited by
77
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • School Effectiveness and School Improvement (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
New Zealand Council for Educational Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
data-driven decision making, academic performance, reading comprehension, intervention effectiveness, replication, growth models, differential effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review